Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 23;7(10):e08246. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08246

Table 7.

Pearson Correlation between CIS and FSS scores and different variables in the two groups at the start of the study.

Total CIS FSS
Body mass index .067 .226
Percentage body fat .520∗∗ .954∗∗
Muscle mass −.540∗∗ −.962∗∗
Basal metabolic rate −.533∗∗ −.976∗∗
Systolic blood pressure .030 .029
Diastolic blood pressure .064 .102
Heart rate .333∗∗ .629∗∗
Total antioxidant capacity −.476∗∗ −.888∗∗
Catalase enzyme −.485∗∗ −.956∗∗
Malondialdehyde .502∗∗ .965∗∗

CIS: Checklist Individual Strength; FSS: Fatigue Severity Scale; numbers presented in this table are the value of r = correlation coefficient. ∗∗Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).