Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 4.
Published in final edited form as: Radiat Res. 2019 Jul 11;192(3):311–323. doi: 10.1667/RR15266.1

TABLE 3.

Comparison of the RABiT-II DCA and Classical DCA Linear and Quadratic Yield Coefficients and Goodness-of-Fit Parameters Calculated with the Dose Estimate Software

Assay type c ± SE α ± SE β ± SE χ2 DF P value r
Classical DCA 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.1062 ± 0.0338 0.0295 ± 0.0047 11.2400 3 0.0105 0.9973
RABiT-II DCA 0.0145 ± 0.0016 0.0008 ± 0.0010 0.0006 ± 0.0001 2.7720 3 0.4282 0.9977

Note. c = Background frequency of dicentrics; SE = standard error; χ = weighted chi squared; DF = degrees of freedom; r = correlation coefficient.