Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 3;7(1):1–9. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.4458

Table. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Patients Confirmed to Have LOF and GOF Variants In Vitro.

Characteristic Patient groupa
LOF variant (n = 19) GOF variant (n = 4)
Probands (n = 6) Relatives (n = 13) Probands (n = 3) Relatives (n = 1)
Age, median (IQR), y 22 (8-34) 20 (10-53) 11 14
Sex
Male 1 (17) 6 (46) 3 (100) 1 (100)
Female 5 (83) 7 (54) 0 0
Arrhythmic event(s) at diagnosis 6 (100) 3 (23) 3 (100) 1 (100)
Exertion/emotion trigger 3 (50) 0 3 (100) 1 (100)
No trigger 2 (33) 3 (100) 0 0
Unknown trigger 1 (17) 0 0 0
Exercise stress testing performed 4 (67) 11 (84) 3 (100) 1 (100)
Normal 3 (75) 7 (64) 0 1 (100)
PVCs only 0 4 (36) 3 (100) 0
Monomorphic couplet 1 (25) 0 0 0
β-Blocker treatmentb 4 (100) 12 (92) 3 (100) 1 (100)
ICD implantb 3 (50) 1 (8) 3 (100) 1 (100)
Atrial arrhythmias 3 (50) 0 1 (33) 0
Deceased 3 (50) 0 0 0

Abbreviations: GOF, gain-of-function; ICD, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; LOF, loss-of-function; PVC, premature ventricular complex.

a

Unless otherwise indicated, data are expressed as number (%) of patients. Note that 1 of the 24 patients (4%) is not included because the variant was wild-type–like during caffeine stimulation (proband 10, with the RyR2-p.I4867T variant). No patient with an LOF variant had abnormal cardiac imaging at presentation, but 2 had minimally abnormal electrocardiograms (nonspecific ST/T wave changes and incomplete right bundle branch block with poor R wave progression).

b

Excludes patients with sudden unexpected death at presentation.