Table 4.
Comparison of truly competitive models of the proportion of plant recognition and its predictors in the best subset (ΔAICc < 4) of models, ordered by AICc values
| Model No. | Predictors | Df | logLik | AICc | ΔAICc | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Number of fishing locations + years of fishing | 4 | 52.51 | − 96.43 | 0.14 | 0.29 |
| 2 | Age + number of fishing locations + years of fishing | 5 | 52.97 | − 95.03 | 1.55 | 0.14 |
| 3 | Number of fishing locations + site | 5 | 52.44 | − 93.98 | 2.60 | 0.09 |
| 4 | Number of fishing locations + job type + site + years of fishing | 8 | 55.90 | − 93.52 | 3.05 | 0.07 |
| 5 | Number of fishing locations + residence + site | 6 | 53.30 | − 93.30 | 3.27 | 0.06 |
| 6 | Age + number of fishing locations + residence + site + years of fishing | 8 | 55.76 | − 93.23 | 3.34 | 0.06 |
| 7 | Frequency of fishing + number of fishing locations + years of fishing | 7 | 54.41 | − 93.07 | 3.50 | 0.05 |
| 8 | Years at the current location + number of fishing locations + site | 6 | 53.14 | − 92.98 | 3.59 | 0.05 |
| 9 | Age + fishing competition + number of fishing locations + years of fishing | 6 | 53.06 | − 92.83 | 3.74 | 0.05 |
| 10 | Age + years at the current location + number of fishing locations + years of fishing | 6 | 53.03 | − 92.76 | 3.81 | 0.05 |
| 11 | Age + fishing for consumption + number of fishing locations + years of fishing | 6 | 53.02 | − 92.75 | 3.82 | 0.05 |
| 12 | Age + number of fishing locations + residence + years of fishing | 6 | 52.99 | − 92.68 | 3.89 | 0.04 |