Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 29;53(1):1885–1895. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2021.1964035

Table 1.

A summary of the continuous glucose measurements by the procedure at various stages of the study.

  RYGB
OAGB
RYBG vs. OAGB
PreOP PostOP p PreOP PostOP p p preOP p postOP p degree of change
Mean glucose concentration, mmol/l 5.3 ± 0.5 4.5 ± 0.3 <.001 5.3 ± 0.3 4.3 ± 0.3 <.001 .772 .158 .069
Min glucose concentration, mmol/l 2.6 ± 0.6 2.5 ± 0.4 .124 3.5 ± 0.4 2.4 ± 0.3 .002 .002 .630 .003
Max glucose concentration, mmol/l 10.0 ± 1.8 8.8 ± 0.9 .042 9.7 ± 1.9 8.3 ± 1.7 .236 .973 .463 .633
R-Squared, % 18.8 ± 3.4 20.7 ± 3.3 .278 15.4 ± 3.3 19.1 ± 3.3 .099 .068 .321 .541
Time spent in < 4 mmol/l, % 9.2 ± 7.7 28.2 ± 18 .003 1.8 ± 2.2 37.7 ± 19.9 .001 .016 .341 .068
Time spent in > =4 & <5 mmol/l, % 33.9 ± 17.2 46.8 ± 12.8 .186 36.9 ± 20.7 44.6 ± 13.6 .501 .762 .744 .720
Time spent in > =5 & <6 mmol/l, % 34.2 ± 8.8 16.6 ± 5.6 <.001 42.4 ± 13.8 13.5 ± 5.0 <.001 .192 .247 .046
Time spent in > =6 & <7 mmol/l, % 16.2 ± 9.8 5.0 ± 2.3 .006 13.8 ± 7.3 3.1 ± 1.7 .009 .587 .076 .926
Time spent in > =7 mmol/l, % 6.5 ± 5.1 3.4 ± 3.8 .132 4.8 ± 2.5 1.5 ± 2.2 .014 .392 .228 .932

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Between-group comparisons were done with independent samples’ t-test, and within-group comparisons before and after the operation were done using paired t-test. RYGB: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; OAGB: one-anastomosis gastric bypass; preOP: prior to the operation; postop: after the operation; BG: blood glucose; CV: coefficient of variation. The times spent in each of the glucose ranges are given as percentages of time relative to the total wear-time of the continuous glucose monitor.