Table 2.
Selection | Outcome | |||||||||
Study (author, year) | Exposed cohort | Nonexposed cohort | Ascertainment of exposure | Outcome of interest | Comparability | Assessment of outcome | Length of followup | Adequacy of follow-up | Total | |
Jaaskelainen et al (2012) | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | 8 | |
Sugimori et al (1998) | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | 7 | ||
Uemura et al (2014) | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | 8 | |
Byrne et al (2016) | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | 8 | |
Odegaard et al (2013) | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | 7 | ||
Cahill et al (2013) | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | 8 | |
Mekary et al (2013) | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | 8 | |
Rong et al (2019) | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | 8 | |
Wennberg et al (2014) | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | 7 | ||
Yokoyama et al (2016) | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | 8 | |
Kubota et al (2016) | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | 8 | |
Mekary et al (2012) | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | 8 | |
Wijtzes et al (2016) | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | 8 | |
Kim et al (2015) | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | 8 |
1 point. Total, total score.