Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2021 May 5;29(5):799–819. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2021.1919984

Table 3.

Correlation matrices for learning scores from traditional memory measures

1 2 3 4 5 6
 1. HVLT-R LR -
 2. BVMT-R LR .59 -
 3. Aggregated HVLT/BVMT LR .86 .91 -
 4. RBANS List Learning LR .61 .71 .74 -
 5. RBANS Story Memory LR .58 .61 .67 .66 -
 6. Aggregated RBANS LR .65 .73 .77 .90 .90 -
 
1 2 3 4 5 6
 1. HVLT-R RLS -
 2. BVMT-R RLS .21 -
 3. Aggregated HVLT/BVMT RLS .75 .81 -
 4. RBANS List Learning RLS .20 .28 .31 -
 5. RBANS Story Memory RLS .20 .10 .18 .22 -
 6. Aggregated RBANS RLS .25 .23 .31 .74 .82 -
 
1 2 3 4
 1. HVLT-R Trial One -
 2. BVMT-R Trial One .69 -
 3. RBANS List Learning Trial One .59 .50 -
 4. RBANS Story Memory Trial One .72 .68 .64 -
 
1 2 3 4
 1. HVLT-R Total Recall -
 2. BVMT-R Total Recall .84 -
 3. RBANS List Learning Total Score .83 .81 -
 4. RBANS Story Memory Total Score .83 .82 .84 -

Note: HVLT-R = Hopkins Verbal Learning Test – Revised, LR = Learning Ratio, BVMT-R = Brief Visuospatial Memory Test – Revised, RBANS = Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status, and RLS = Raw Learning Slope. All LR, Trial One, and Total Recall/Score bivariate correlation coefficients were significant at p < .001. RLS bivariate correlation coefficients greater than .22 were significant at p < .01.