Table 4.

Partial correlation coefficients between learning slope, Trial One, and total learning performance and both total hippocampal volume and ¹⁸F-Flutemetamol composite SUVR uptake, after controlling for age, education, and premorbid intellect

Measure	Total Hippocampal Volume			18F-Flutemetamol SUVR
	r	r2	p value	r	r2	p value
HVLT-R LR	.39	.15	<.001	−.35	.12	<.001
BVMT-R LR	.37	.14	<.001	−.48	.23	<.001
Aggregate HVLT-R/BVMT-R LR	.45	.20	<.001	−.49	.24	<.001
RBANS List Learning LR	.40	.16	<.001	−.44	.19	<.001
RBANS Story Memory LR	.41	.17	<.001	−.50	.25	<.001
Aggregate RBANS LR	.46	.21	<.001	−.53	.28	<.001
HVLT-R RLS	.27	.07	.006	−.01	.01	.92
BVMT-R RLS	.24	.06	.01	−.31	.10	.001
Aggregate HVLT-R/BVMT-R RLS	.33	.11	<.001	−.22	.05	.03
RBANS List Learning RLS	.31	.10	.001	−.27	.07	.005
RBANS Story Memory RLS	.21	.04	.06	−.18	.03	.06
Aggregate RBANS RLS	.32	.10	.001	−.28	.08	.003
HVLT-R Trial One	.32	.10	.001	−.59	.35	<.001
BVMT-R Trial One	.35	.12	<.001	−.47	.22	<.001
RBANS List Learning Trial One	.25	.06	.008	−.44	.19	<.001
RBANS Story Memory Trial One	.28	.08	.004	−.53	.28	<.001
HVLT-R Total Recall	.42	.18	<.001	−.61	.37	<.001
BVMT-R Total Recall	.42	.17	<.001	−.58	.34	<.001
RBANS List Learning Total Score	.38	.15	<.001	−.57	.32	<.001
RBANS Story Memory Total Score	.36	.13	<.001	−.62	.38	<.001

Note: HVLT-R = Hopkins Verbal Learning Test – Revised, LR = Learning Ratio, BVMT-R = Brief Visual Memory Test – Revised, RBANS = Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status, and RLS = Raw Learning Score. Significance values reflect p value relationship between learning score and either total hippocampal volume or ¹⁸F-Flutemetamol composite SUVR uptake. Effect Sizes were measured using r² values. A two-tailed alpha level was set at .01 for all analyses. The total hippocampal volume variable was additionally adjusted for total intracranial volume.