Table 2.
The clinical characteristics of misdiagnosed cases
Gender and age | Single or multiple | Known malignant tumor | HBV or HCV | Liver cirrhosis | Abnormal tumor markers | Imaging technique and enhancement patterns | Radiology diagnosis | Pathological diagnosis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F, 51 | Single | N | N | N | N | MRI, rim-like enhancement | Probably malignancy | HSH |
M, 17 | Multiple | N | N | N | N | MRI + CT, no enhancement | Probably malignancy | HSH |
F, 56 | Single | N | N | N | N |
CT + MRI, rim-like enhancement |
Probably malignancy | HSH |
F, 27 | Multiple | N | N | N | N | MRI, no enhancement | Probably malignancy | HSH |
M, 63 | Single | N | N | N | CA199 | CT + MRI, peripheral heterogeneous enhancement | ICC | HSH |
M, 50 | Multiple | N | HBV | Liver cirrhosis | CA199 | CT + MRI, no enhancement | Probably malignancy | HSH |
M, 53 | Single | N | HBV | Liver cirrhosis | N | CT, no enhancement | Probably malignancy | HSH |
F, 54 | Single | ICC | HBV | N | CA199 | CT, no enhancement | Metastasis | HSH |
M, 52 | Single | HCC | HBV | N | N | CT + MRI, rim-like enhancement | Metastasis | HSH |
M, 51 | Single | N | N | N | N | CT, peripheral heterogeneous enhancement | ICC | SCH |
M, 48 | Single | N | HBV | N | AFP CA199 | CT + MRI, no enhancement | HCC | SCH |
F, 34 | Single | N | HBV | N | N | MRI + CT, wash-in and wash-out | HCC | SCH |
F, 46 | Single | N | N | N |
AFP CA199 |
CT, no enhancement | Probably malignancy | SCH |
M, 36 | Multiple | N | N | N | N | CT + MRI, no enhancement | Probably malignancy | SCH |
F, 60 | Single | N | N | N | N | CT, no enhancement | Probably malignancy | SCH |
F female, M male, N not found, elevated level of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199), HSH hepatic sclerosed hemangioma, SCH sclerosing cavernous hemangioma, MRI + CT MRI examination was first performed, then CT was performed for further differential diagnosis, CT + MRI CT first, then MRI for further differential diagnosis