Skip to main content
. 2021 May 27;39(11):1059–1068. doi: 10.1007/s11604-021-01139-z

Table 3.

Imaging features of sclerosed hemangioma and sclerosing hemangiomas

Hepatic sclerosed hemangioma
(n = 12)
Sclerosing cavernous hemangioma
(n = 36)
P value
Location 0.510
 Left lobe 33.3% (4/12) 47.2% (17/36)
 Right lobe 66.7% (8/12) 52.8% (19/36)
Tumor size (cm) 3.9 (1–36.5) 7.5 (1–39) 0.323
Tumor shape 0.316
 Round 25% (3/12) 44.4% (16/36)
 Irregular 75% (9/12) 55.6% (20/36)
 Capsular retraction 8.3% (1/12) 5.6% (2/36) 1.000
 Slightly low density on plain CT 88.9% (8/9) 79.4% (27/34) 1.000
 Calcification 33.3% (3/9) 8.8% (3/34) 0.095
 Heterogeneous density 55.6% (5/9) 58.8% (20/34) 1.000
 Slightly hypointense on T1-weighted image 75% (6/8) 80% (8/10) 1.000
T2-weighted image 0.444
 Hyperintense (similar to cerebro-spinal fluid) 12.5% (1/8) 0
 Slightly hyperintense 87.5% (7/8) 100% (10/10)
 Restriction on DWI 0 0
 Transient hepatic attenuation difference around the lesion 0 16.7% (6/36) 0.315
Dynamic enhancement patterns 0.000‡,*
 Trend of centripetal enhancement accompanied by central non-enhancing areas 25% (3/12) 83.3% (30/36)
 Atypical 75% (9/12) 16.7% (6/36)

*Significant level P < 0.05

Mann–Whitney U test

Fisher exact test