Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 27;18(11):1843–1850. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.06.013

Table 3.

IES and sexual behavior by employment status and duration of relationship

Employment status (n = 1,139) P-value Duration of relationship (yr) (n = 1,139) P-value
Full-time (n = 836) Part-time (n = 111) Students (n = 192) <1 (n = 164) 1-5 (n = 580) 6-10 (n = 255) ≥11 (n = 140)
IES* 27.2 ± 8.8 29.9 ± 7.2 26.5 ± 8.4 .002 26.9 ± 7.7 26.3 ± 8.8 27.4 ± 8.9 32.2 ± 6.7 <.001
IES ≥26, n (%) 480 (57.4) 81 (73.0) 101 (52.6) .002 93 (56.7) 308 (53.1) 147 (57.6) 114 (81.4) <.001
Intrusive score 15.0±4.9 16.0±4.6 14.2±4.8 .008 14.5±4.4 14.3±5.0 15.3±5.0 17.5±3.9 <.001
Avoidance score 12.3±4.7 14.0±3.9 12.3±4.8 .001 12.4±4.4 12.0±4.8 12.1±4.6 14.8±3.8 <.001
Sexual behavior
Frequency of sexual intercourse during COVID-19, n (%)
Decreased 28 (3.3) 3 (2.7) 9 (4.7) .757 0 (0.0) 36 (6.2) 0 (0.0) 4 (2.9) <.001
Same as before 581 (69.5) 82 (73.9) 131 (68.2) 79 (48.2) 402 (69.3) 199 (78.0) 114 (81.4)
Increased 227 (27.2) 26 (23.4) 52 (27.1) 85 (51.8) 142 (24.5) 56 (22.0) 22 (15.7)
COVID-19 affected quality of usual sexual life, n (%)
Negatively 33 (3.9) 3 (2.7) 17 (8.9) <.001 11 (6.7) 38 (6.6) 0 (0.0) 4 (4.7) <.001
Same as before 647 (77.4) 89 (80.2) 161 (83.9) 104 (63.4) 475 (81.9) 204 (80.0) 897 (78.8)
Positively 156 (18.7) 19 (17.1) 14 (7.3) 49 (29.9) 67 (11.6) 51 (20.0) 189 (16.6)
COVID-19 affected emotional bonding, n (%)
Negatively 29 (3.5) 3 (2.7) 15 (7.8) <.001 11 (6.7) 33 (5.7) 0 (0.0) 3 (2.1) <.001
No change 384 (45.9) 78 (70.3) 134 (69.8) 68 (41.5) 333 (57.4) 122 (47.8) 73 (52.1)
Positively 423 (50.6) 30 (27.0) 43 (22.4) 85 (51.8) 214 (36.9) 133 (52.2) 64 (45.7)

Mean ± SD (all such values).

Due to rounding, the total may not add to 100% exactly.Bold P-values means P < .05