Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 12;74:101666. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101666

Table 9.

Out-of-Sample Forecast evaluation.

Pre-COVID Announcement
Post-COVID Announcement
Mode1 1 vs Model 2
Mode1 1 vs Model 2
h = 10 h = 20 h = 10 h = 20
Clark & West 0.9911***
(0.2410)
[4.1132]
0.9052***
(0.2173)
[4.1657]
15.9457***
(4.8775)
[3.2692]
14.7262***
(4.3784)
[3.3633]

Note: Model 1 incorporates the Uncertainty (VIX) predictor while Model 2 is the Historical Average. Thus, the former is the unrestricted model while the latter is the restricted model. *** and ** & * imply the rejection of the null hypothesis of equal forecast accuracy at 1%, 5% & 10% levels of significance, respectively. The null hypothesis of a zero coefficient is rejected if this statistic is greater than +1.282 (for a one sided 0.10 test), +1.645 (for a one sided 0.05 test) and + 2.00 for 0.01 test (for a one sided 0.01 test) (see Clark & West, 2007). Two out-of-Sample forecast horizons are considered: 10-day & 20-day ahead forecast horizons. Values in parentheses – () denote standard errors while those reported in square brackets – [] are for t-statistics.