Table 5. Job’s Plot Data for the Tested Compounds in the Presence of Fe3+ and Cu2+a.
Fe3+ |
Cu2+ |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
cmpd | λ (nm) | X | n | λ (nm) | X | n |
18 | 375 | 0.69 | 2 | 330 | 0.70 | 2 |
19 | 375 | 0.68 | 2 | 330 | 0.51 | 1 |
20 | 370 | X1 = 0.53 | n1 = 1 | 330 | 0.53 | 1 |
X2 = 0.80 | n2 = 4 | |||||
25 | 318 | X1 = 0.57 | n1 = 1 | 330 | 0.44 | 1 |
X2 = 0.77 | n2 = 3 | |||||
28 | 316 | X1 = 0.53 | n1 = 1 | 330 | 0.53 | 1 |
X2 = 0.74 | n2 = 3 | |||||
30 | 310 | X1 = 0.53 | n1 = 1 | 312 | 0.50 | 1 |
X2 = 0.74 | n2 = 3 |
The table shows the wavelength values (λ) in which the absorbance variation was measured, the molar ratios (X) that cause the maximum variation of absorbance, and the coordination values (n) that correspond to the number of ligand molecules per cation.