TABLE 1.
Comparison of topological parameters of networks.
| Metacommunity |
Sediment |
Water |
||||
| Real | Random | Real | Random | Real | Random | |
| Number of nodes | 128 | 128 | 607 | 607 | 1,049 | 1,049 |
| Number of edges | 471 | 471 | 2,265 | 2,265 | 20,857 | 20,857 |
| Average degree | 7.359 | 7.359 | 7.463 | 7.463 | 39.765 | 39.765 |
| Average path length | 2.599 | 2.634 ± 0.012* | 5.751a | 3.413 ± 0.005* | 3.518b | 2.175 ± 0.001* |
| Diameter | 8.000 | 4.869 ± 0.339* | 17.000a | 6.192 ± 0.396* | 11.000b | 3 ± 0* |
| Clustering coefficient | 0.552 | 0.058 ± 0.007* | 0.416a | 0.013 ± 0.002* | 0.488b | 0.038 ± 0* |
| Centralization degree | 0.226 | 0.06 ± 0.012* | 0.059a | 0.016 ± 0.002* | 0.153b | 0.02 ± 0.002* |
| Centralization betweenness | 0.036 | 0.036 ± 0.009 | 0.212a | 0.014 ± 0.002* | 0.026b | 0.001 ± 0* |
| Modularity | 0.446 | 0.318 ± 0.011* | 0.708a | 0.336 ± 0.004* | 0.445b | 0.126 ± 0.002* |
The differences between the real co-occurrence networks and their associated random networks (permutation = 999, values shown mean ± SD) were assessed using a Z-test (*indicates the significant differences of P < 0.05). The differences between sediment and water bacterial network were assessed using a t-test (different lowercase letters indicate the significant difference of P < 0.05).