Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 22;12:716732. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.716732

TABLE 1.

Comparison of topological parameters of networks.

Metacommunity
Sediment
Water
Real Random Real Random Real Random
Number of nodes 128 128 607 607 1,049 1,049
Number of edges 471 471 2,265 2,265 20,857 20,857
Average degree 7.359 7.359 7.463 7.463 39.765 39.765
Average path length 2.599 2.634 ± 0.012* 5.751a 3.413 ± 0.005* 3.518b 2.175 ± 0.001*
Diameter 8.000 4.869 ± 0.339* 17.000a 6.192 ± 0.396* 11.000b 3 ± 0*
Clustering coefficient 0.552 0.058 ± 0.007* 0.416a 0.013 ± 0.002* 0.488b 0.038 ± 0*
Centralization degree 0.226 0.06 ± 0.012* 0.059a 0.016 ± 0.002* 0.153b 0.02 ± 0.002*
Centralization betweenness 0.036 0.036 ± 0.009 0.212a 0.014 ± 0.002* 0.026b 0.001 ± 0*
Modularity 0.446 0.318 ± 0.011* 0.708a 0.336 ± 0.004* 0.445b 0.126 ± 0.002*

The differences between the real co-occurrence networks and their associated random networks (permutation = 999, values shown mean ± SD) were assessed using a Z-test (*indicates the significant differences of P < 0.05). The differences between sediment and water bacterial network were assessed using a t-test (different lowercase letters indicate the significant difference of P < 0.05).