TABLE 1.

Taxonomic, phenotypic, and genotypic classification of S. maltophilia isolates

Isolate	% Identity		Group by:
			Phenotype		Antibiogramsc	Genotype
	API	BIOLOG	APIa	BIOLOGb		TGGEa	BOX-PCRd
c1	99.9	0.881	I	I	VI	I	V
c2	99.8	0.948	II	III	VI	I	III
c3	99.9	0.715	I	III	VI	I	V
c4	99.9	0.945	I	III	V	I	III
c5	99.2	0.900	IV	IV	VI	I	IV
c6	99.9	0.918	I	III	VI	I	I
c7	99.9	0.798	I	III	V	I	IV
c8	99.9	0.827	I	III	VI	I	IV
c9	99.9	0.880	I	III	V	II	I
c10	99.9	0.871	I	III	VI	III	IV
c11	98.6	0.804	VI	III	V	V	V
c12	98.6	0.906	VI	I	V	I	IV
c13	99.9	1.000	I	I	V	I	V
c14	99.9	0.911	I	III	VI	I	III
c15	99.9	0.978	I	III	V	I	II
c16	99.9	0.731	I	III	VI	I	III
c17	99.2	0.807	IV	III	V	I	III
c18	99.9	0.875	I	III	V	I	III
c19	99.9	0.884	I	III	IV	I	II
c20	99.9	0.901	I	I	IV	I	III
e1	99.9	0.762	I	IV	VI	I	III
e2	99.9	0.821	I	V	III	I	III
e3	99.9	0.765	I	III	III	I	I
e4	99.9	0.869	I	I	VI	I	II
e5	99.9	0.915	I	I	V	I	II
e6	99.2	0.836	IV	I	II	II	I
e7	99.9	0.798	I	III	I	II	II
e8	99.2	0.823	IV	III	VI	I	III
e9	99.2	0.807	IV	I	I	II	IV
e10	99.4	0.752	III	III	III	I	III
e11	97.7	0.946	VII	III	V	III	II
e12	99.9	0.853	I	I	V	I	I
e13	99.0	0.836	V	II	III	I	III
e14	99.4	0.928	III	III	VI	IV	I
e15	99.9	0.835	I	III	VI	IV	V
e16	99.9	0.836	I	VI	I	I	III
e17	99.9	0.836	I	III	I	II	V
e18	99.8	0.904	II	III	VI	I	I
e19	99.9	0.895	I	I	VI	V	II
t20	99.9	0.720	I	I	III	I	I

^aGrouping on the basis of 100% similarity according to cluster analysis. 

^bGrouping on the basis of 85% similarity according to cluster analysis. 

^cGrouping on the basis of 42% similarity according to cluster analysis. 

^dGrouping on the basis of 90% similarity according to cluster analysis.