Table 2R.
Revised Hierarchical Multiple regression analysis results of main (step 1) and interaction effects (step 2).
| Step 1 — Main Effects | ||
|---|---|---|
| Variables | ß (p) | R2 |
| 0.602*** | ||
| Resilience | −0.546 (<0.001) *** | |
| Acceptance | −0.004 (0.956) | |
| Active Coping | −0.031 (0.693) | |
| Behavioral Disengagement | 0.017 (0.798) | |
| Denial | 0.125 (0.039) * | |
| Emotional Support | −0.141 (0.0497) * | |
| Humor | 0.035 (0.587) | |
| Instrumental Support | 0.143 (0.0520) # | |
| Planning | 0.08 (0.286) | |
| Positive Reframing | −0.151 (0.04) * | |
| Religion | 0.038 (0.531) | |
| Self-Blame | 0.213 (0.002) ** | |
| Self-Distraction | 0.183 (0.014) * | |
| Substance Use | 0.194 (0.003) ** | |
| Venting | 0.071 (0.257) | |
| Step 2 – Interactions Between Resilience and Coping Strategies | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | ß | R2 | Δ R2 |
| 0.667*** | 0.065 | ||
| Resilience x Acceptance | 0.024 (0.965) | ||
| Resilience x Active Coping | 0.216 (0.699) | ||
| Resilience x Behavioral Disengagement | −0.841 (0.028) * | ||
| Resilience x Denial | 0.171 (0.629) | ||
| Resilience x Emotional Support | −0.934 (0.056) # | ||
| Resilience x Humor | −0.595 (0.179) | ||
| Resilience x Instrumental Support | 0.62 (0.179) | ||
| Resilience x Planning | −1.005 (0.084) # | ||
| Resilience x Positive Reframing | 0.281 (0.613) | ||
| Resilience x Religion | 0.095 (0.797) | ||
| Resilience x Self-Blame | 0.786 (0.027) * | ||
| Resilience x Self-Distraction | 0.295 (0.544) | ||
| Resilience x Substance Use | 0.128 (0.62) | ||
| Resilience x Venting | −0.58 (0.122) | ||
Note. Beta values represent standardized values at final model. # trending, *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001.