Table 1.
Study | Study size | Design | Population Characteristics | Findings | Association |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
13 | KC patients (n=571) Non-KC controls (n=571) |
Retrospective case-control study |
|
T2DM showed a protective effect against KC development (odds ratio = 0.2195) | Inverse association of KC development with DM |
14 | KC patients without DM (n=269) KC patients with DM (n=26) |
Retrospective cross-sectional study |
|
T2DM showed a protective effect against more severe KC (odds ratio = 0.2); No difference in DM prevalence in KC population | Inverse association of DM with KC severity |
17 | KC patients (n=1383) non-KC controls (n=1383) | Retrospective case-control study |
|
T2DM showed a protective effect against KC development (odds ratio = 0.350) | Inverse association of KC development with DM |
18 | KC patients (n=16,053) non-KC controls (n=16,053) | Retrospective longitudinal cohort study |
|
20% lower odds of KC development with uncomplicated DM; 52% lower odds of KC development with DM-associated organ failure | Inverse association of KC development with DM |
19 | KC patients (n=2679) non-KC controls (n=26,7900 | Retrospective longitudinal cohort study |
|
No significant difference in DM prevalence in KC patients. Total DM odds ratio=1.03, T1DM odds ratio=0.87, T2DM odds ratio=1.07 | No significant association between KC development and DM |
298 | KC patients (n=575) non-KC controls (n=2875) | Retrospective longitudinal cohort study |
|
No significant difference in DM prevalence in KC patients. Multivariate odds ratio=1.02 | No significant association between KC development and DM |
299 | 29 studies incorporating 50,358,341 subjects | Systematic review and meta-analysis |
|
Odds of developing KC were 23% lower in T2DM, but relationship was not significant | No significant association between KC development and DM |
22 | KC patients (n=2051) non-KC controls (n=12,306 | Retrospective case-control study |
|
No significant association in KC and DM, with odds ratio 1.60 (0.89–2.89) and p-value 0.149. | No significant association between KC development and DM |
20 | KC patients (n=1377) non-KC controls (n=4131) AND T2DM KC patients (n=75) non-DM KC controls (n=225) |
Retrospective case-control and Cross-sectional study |
|
Higher prevalence of T2DM in KC population compared to controls (6.75% and 4.84%, respectively); Higher severity of KC in DM patients (odds ratio = 2.691) | Positive association of KC development with T2DM |
21 | KC patients (n=1552) non-KC controls (n=7.760) | Retrospective cohort study |
|
Higher prevalence of T2DM in KC population compared to controls (19.2% and 14.5%, respectively); Positive association of KC with DM (odds ratio = 1.35) | Positive association of KC development with DM |