Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 5.
Published in final edited form as: Crystals (Basel). 2021 Jul 1;11(7):771. doi: 10.3390/cryst11070771

Table 4.

Comparison of deposited and 3D-RISM-refined structures. Outliers are in percent; RMS vs deposited is in Å, averaged over all non-heavy atoms.

Resolution, Å 2oiu
2.6
RISM 3r4f
3.5
RISM 3e5e
2.9
RISM 3f2q
2.95
RISM 3iwn
3.2
RISM 3bo3
3.4
RISM
molprobity score 2.59 1.73 3.21 1.65 2.22 2.07 2.50 1.84 3.63 1.59 2.33 1.59
clashscore 8.0 0.2 37.8 0.0 2.8 1.7 6.4 0.6 42.6 0.5 6.1 2.0
pucker outliers 4.2 3.5 7.6 7.6 3.8 5.8 2.8 0.9 12.4 9.7 6.6 9.1
suite outliers 20.4 11.3 24.2 16.7 13.5 9.6 19.4 8.3 28.5 22.0 37.2 28.6
average suiteness 0.447 0.621 0.449 0.534 0.537 0.534 0.456 0.507 0.480 0.513 0.370 0.433
R-work 0.203 0.208 0.239 0.232 0.222 0.190 0.200 0.218 0.222 0.209 0.282 0.245
R-free 0.238 0.244 0.271 0.245 0.259 0.225 0.243 0.247 0.292 0.253 0.325 0.275
RMS vs deposited 0.24 0.42 0.52 0.36 0.46 0.43