Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 5;7(45):eabg8583. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abg8583

Table 2. Differences in gene expression between C518F FN1 heterozygous and homozygous hiCPC-derived chondrogenic pellets compared with wild type after 5 weeks of chondrogenesis.

HETERO vs. WT* HOMO vs. WT*
Gene FC Beta SE P FC Beta SE P
ACAN 0.57 −0.81 0.23 4.52 × 10−4 0.57 −1.10 0.24 2.62 × 10−4
ADAMTS-5 1.55 0.63 0.48 1.93 × 10−1 5.14 2.36 0.68 5.45 × 10−4
ALPL 1.41 0.50 0.56 3.79 × 10−1 2.45 1.30 0.63 4.03 × 10−2
COL10A1 1.03 0.05 0.41 9.11 × 10−1 1.86 0.90 0.56 1.09 × 10−1
FN1 0.25 −1.98 0.16 1.00 × 10−4 0.33 −1.59 0.13 1.00 × 10−4
ITGA3 1.18 −0.41 0.77 5.93 × 10−1 3.91 1.97 0.65 2.51 × 10−3
ITGA5 0.23 −2.13 0.23 1.00 × 10−4 1.01 0.02 0.24 9.34 × 10−1
ITGAV 0.66 −0.60 0.37 1.03 × 10−1 1.53 0.61 0.37 1.03 × 10−1
ITB1 0.92 −0.12 0.33 7.20 × 10−1 2.09 1.07 0.33 1.11 × 10−3
RUNX2 1.42 0.50 0.28 6.75 × 10−2 1.79 0.84 0.26 9.48 × 10−4

*Fold change (FC), Beta value, SE, and P value for expression levels (−ΔCt) of 10 genes as determined by generalized estimation equations, with gene expression levels (−ΔCt) as dependent variable and genotype as factor, when comparing FN1 heterozygous (HETERO) and FN1 homozygous (HOMO) pellets to wild-type (WT) pellets.