Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 5;11:21751. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01279-2

Table 3.

Associations between attitudes towards NPIs and public health messaging and adoption clusters for COVID-19 NPIs.

Attitudes towards COVID-19 public health behaviours and messaging Odds of being a non-adopter compared to adopter
Total
N = 4498 (%)
Adopter cluster (N = 3504) (%) Non-adopter cluster (N = 994) (%) OR 95% CI aOR 95% CI
Have you downloaded a contact tracing application for COVID-19
No (REF) 3105 (69) 2211 (71) 894 (29) 1.00 1.00
Yes 1393 (31) 1293 (93) 100 (7) 0.19 0.15–0.24 0.30 0.24–0.38
Public health messaging has been clear/understandable
Strongly agree/Agree (REF) 2548 (57) 2274 (89) 274 (11) 1.00 1.00
Strongly disagree/disagree 1835 (41) 1155 (63) 680 (37) 4.89 4.18–5.72 3.69 3.09–4.40
Unsure/can’t say 115 (3) 75 (65) 40 (35) 4.43 2.96–6.63 3.45 2.14–5.56
Public health messaging around COVID-19 has been consistent
Strongly agree/agree (REF) 2195 (49) 1974 (90) 221 (10) 1.00 1.00
Strongly disagree/disagree 2155 (48) 1438 (67) 717 (33) 4.45 3.77–5.25 3.69 3.06–4.45
Unsure/can’t say 148 (3) 92 (62) 56 (38) 5.44 3.79–7.79 4.69 3.09–7.10
COVID-19 restrictions are harming our economy
Strongly agree/agree (REF) 3477 (77) 2555 (73) 922 (27) 1.00 1.00
Strongly disagree/disagree 838 (19) 781 (93) 57 (7) 0.20 0.15–0.27 0.43 0.32–0.59
Unsure/can’t say 183 (4) 168 (92) 15 (8) 0.25 0.15–0.42 0.42 0.24–0.74
Has messaging/advertising had an impact on your likelihood to do these?
Physical distancing
 Much more/more likely 3024 (67) 2793 (92) 231 (8) 0.11 0.09–0.13 0.13 0.11–0.16
 No difference (REF) 1173 (26) 667 (57) 506 (43) 1.00 1.00
 Lot less/little less likely 239 (5) 27 (11) 212 (89) 10.35 6.82–15.70 8.34 5.24–13.28
 Not seen any messaging or advertising 62 (1) 17 (27) 45 (73) 3.49 1.97–6.17 10.48 5.40–20.34
Masking
 Much more/more likely 3108 (69) 2902 (93) 206 (7) 0.10 0.08–0.12 0.13 0.11–0.17
 No difference (REF) 960 (21) 559 (58) 401 (42) 1.00 1.00
 Lot less/little less likely 388 (9) 38 (10) 350 (90) 12.84 8.97–18.38 9.49 6.44–13.99
 Not seen any messaging or advertising 42 (1) 5 (12) 37 (88) 10.32 4.02–26.48 35.81 12.98–98.82
Avoiding public places
 Much more/more likely 3033 (67) 2846 (94) 187 (6) 0.72 0.06–0.09 0.09 0.07–0.11
 No difference (REF) 1138 (25) 596 (52) 542 (48) 1.00 1.00
 Lot less/little less likely 269 (6) 44 (16) 225 (84) 5.62 3.99–7.93 4.34 2.96–6.36
 Not seen any messaging or advertising 58 (1) 18 (31) 40 (69) 2.44 1.38–4.31 7.29 3.84–13.86
Staying home when sick
 Much more/more likely 3203 (71) 2845 (89) 358 (11) 0.16 0.13–0.19 0.17 0.14–0.20
 No difference (REF) 1131 (25) 631 (56) 500 (44) 1.00 1.00
 Lot less/little less likely 107 (2) 22 (21) 85 (79) 4.88 3.01–7.91 5.08 2.87–8.98
 Not seen any messaging or advertising 57 (1) 6 (11) 51 (89) 10.73 4.57–25.20 36.90 14.52–93.72

Bold signals statistically significant p-values (< 0.05).

Odds ratios are the odds of being in the non-adopter cluster compared to odds of being in the adopter cluster.

CI confidence interval, REF reference group, cOR crude odds ratio using logistic regression, aOR adjusted odds ratio, adjusted for sex, age, province of residence, highest education and political leaning.