Table 5.
Test results of gender and household registration heterogeneity
| Variable | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MH | PH | MH | PH | MH | PH | MH | PH | ||
| Female | Male | Rural | Urban | ||||||
| IIequality | − 1.047*** (− 11.13) | − 0.387*** (− 4.06) | − 0.915*** (− 9.27) | − 0.386*** (− 3.81) | −0.957*** (− 10.16) | −0.319*** (− 3.23) | −0.930*** (− 9.27) | −0.273*** (− 4.59) | |
| SC | Trust | 0.134*** (− 8.650) | 0.0269* (− 1.720) | 0.158*** (− 9.790) | 0.0637*** (− 3.880) | 0.162*** (− 9.320) | 0.0493*** (− 2.800) | 0.153*** (− 9.450) | 0.0488*** (− 2.940) |
| Fair | 0.102*** (− 8.180) | 0.0643*** (− 5.040) | 0.106*** (− 8.020) | 0.0713*** (− 5.120) | 0.115*** (− 9.320) | 0.0902*** (− 3.950) | 0.0886*** (− 6.610) | 0.0899*** (− 6.390) | |
| Support | 0.000 (− 0.100) | − 0.030*** (− 6.03) | − 0.0101** (− 2.06) | −0.0209*** (− 3.98) | −0.003 (− 0.68) | −0.0125** (− 2.49) | −0.004 (− 0.80) | −0.037*** (− 7.38) | |
| Relations | 0.011 (− 1.180) | 0.000 (− 0.010) | 0.040*** (− 4.040) | 0.022** (− 2.130) | 0.022** (− 2.370) | 0.002 (− 0.170) | 0.028*** (− 2.800) | 0.018* (− 1.740) | |
| Jiegousc | 0.013 (− 1.630) | − 0.020** (− 2.40) | 0.017** (− 2.040) | − 0.007 (− 0.81) | 0.013** (− 1.510) | − 0.023** (− 2.53) | 0.014* (− 1.650) | − 0.028** (− 1.18) | |
| CV | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| PDV | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Observations | 11,879 | 11,879 | 10,872 | 10,872 | 11,546 | 11,546 | 11,205 | 11,205 | |
| Prob > F | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
| Pseudo R2 | 0.042 | 0.058 | 0.046 | 0.051 | 0.049 | 0.062 | 0.042 | 0.056 | |
MH Mental health, PH Physical health, IIequality Income inequality, SC Social capital, CV Control variable, PDV Province dummy variablet
*** P < 0.01, ** P < 0.05, * P < 0.1, robust t statistic reported in brackets