Table 4.
S&O combined weights of each evaluation index
| Evaluation index | The importance rankings of indicators by the G1 method | Objective Weights (CRITIC method) | The ratio of the importance of indicators | Combination of S&O weights |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| X11, Sufficient rate of PPE | 2 | 0.0655 | 1.0000 | 0.1079 |
| X12, Adequacy rate of equipment and facilities | 4 | 0.0752 | 1.0845 | 0.0995 |
| X21, Standardized patient management rate | 1 | 0.0642 | \ | 0.1079 |
| X31, Standard rate of sterile supplies management | 10 | 0.0622 | 1.2391 | 0.0544 |
| X41, Qualified rate of environmental cleaning and disinfection | 9 | 0.0771 | 1.0000 | 0.0674 |
| X51, HH compliance rate | 8 | 0.0766 | 1.0143 | 0.0674 |
| X52, Correct rate of HH | 11 | 0.0697 | 1.0000 | 0.0544 |
| X61, Correct use rate of PPE | 3 | 0.0815 | 1.0000 | 0.1079 |
| X62, Occupational protection knowledge awareness rate | 7 | 0.0777 | 1.2173 | 0.0684 |
| X71, Training rate of COVID-19 P&C knowledge of HcWs | 6 | 0.0946 | 1.0000 | 0.0832 |
| X72, Qualified rate of COVID-19 P&C knowledge assessment | 5 | 0.0629 | 1.1955 | 0.0832 |
| X81, Standard rate of medical waste disposal | 13 | 0.0860 | 1.2419 | 0.0438 |
| X82, Disposal standard rate of contaminated fabric | 12 | 0.1069 | 1.0000 | 0.0544 |
G1 Order Relation Analysis, CRITIC Criteria Importance Though Intercriteria Correlation, PPE Personal Protective Equipment, HH Hand Hygiene, COVID-19 Corona Virus Disease 2019, S&O Subjective and Objective, P&C Prevention and Control