Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 2;13:8241–8255. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S329963

Table 3.

Univariate Cox Analyses of PFS and OS

Variable Category PFS OS
HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P
Age ≥65 vs <65 0.702 (0.361–1.364) 0.296 0.796 (0.412–1.541) 0.499
Gender Female vs Male 0.837 (0.396–1.771) 0.642 0.663 (0.312–1.406) 0.284
BMI(kg/m2) <18.5 or >23.9 vs.18.5–23.9 1.032 (0.530–2.011) 0.926 1.076 (0.554–2.091) 0.829
Histology Non-adenocarcinoma vs Adenocarcinoma 1.096 (0.578–2.081) 0.778 1.239 (0.655–2.344) 0.509
TNM stage IV vs III 1.333 (0.608–2.925) 0.473 1.198 (0.549–2.617) 0.650
ECOG PS ≥1 vs 0 1.049 (0.510–2.158) 0.896 1.194 (0.575–2.478) 0.634
Smoking status Former/Current vs Never 1.315 (0.650–2.657) 0.446 1.526 (0.757–3.078) 0.238
Actionable mutation (-)/undetected vs (+) 22.777 (0.041–12,505.518) 0.331 22.628 (0.067–7697.921) 0.294
Metastasis Yes vs No 1.222 (0.557–2.681) 0.617 1.036 (0.474–2.265) 0.929
Radiotherapy Yes vs No 2.087 (1.098–3.965) 0.025 2.294 (1.204–4.368) 0.012
PD-L1 expression ≥50% vs 0–50% 0.226 (0.028–1.849) 0.166 0.227 (0.028–1.867) 0.168
PD-L1 status Positive vs Negative 1.008 (0.126–8.082) 0.994 0.933 (0.114–7.609) 0.949
Line of immunotherapy ≥3 vs <3 1.299 (0.611–2.760) 0.497 1.169 (0.552–2.475) 0.683
ICI substance PD-1 vs PD-L1 0.663 (0.303–1.451) 0.303 0.624 (0.286–1.365) 0.238
Mono-immunotherapy Yes vs No 1.933 (1.012–3.690) 0.046 1.612 (0.841–3.087) 0.150
Immune adverse events Yes vs No 21.511 (0.012–37,969.388) 0.421 21.115(0.003–133,441.458) 0.495
Leading STM at baseline > the upper limit of normal vs < the upper limit of normal 0.911 (0.341–2.430) 0.852 0.981 (0.372–2.588) 0.969
Leading STM at 6 weeks > the upper limit of normal vs < the upper limit of normal 1.548 (0.611–3.923) 0.357 1.523 (0.604 to 3.839) 0.373
Leading STM change Decrease <20% vs Decrease ≥20% 0.201 (0.081–0.502) 0.001 0.275 (0.117–0.643) 0.003
Pretreatment NLR ≥5 vs <5 0.524 (0.264–1.040) 0.065 0.425 (0.213–0.848) 0.015
Posttreatment NLR ≥5 vs <5 0.179 (0.091–0.35) <0.0001 0.158 (0.080–0.314) <0.0001
NLR change Decrease ≥20% vs Decrease <20% 0.850 (0.448–1.614) 0.620 0.892 (0.469–1.695) 0.726
Increase ≥20% vs Increase <20% 1.720 (0.827–3.575) 0.147 1.713 (0.827–3.551) 0.148
Combination Score 0
1 3.150 (1.021–9.716) 0.046 2.099 (0.731–6.028) 0.168
2 21.418 (6.975–65.763) <0.0001 17.110 (5.943–49.260) <0.0001

Notes: Cox regression models were applied to find independent indicators associated with PFS and OS and estimate the hazard ratio (HR). Factors which were statistically significant in the univariate analysis were incorporated into the multivariate analysis. Figures are given as HR (95% CI). A P value of < 0.05 was regarded statistically significant.

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; TNM, tumor node metastasis; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; ICI, immune-checkpoint inhibitors; PD-1, programmed cell death-1; PD-L1, programmed cell death-ligand 1; STM, serum tumor markers; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.