Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 30;2015(9):CD006536. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006536.pub4

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Cells compared to no cells for acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Cells compared to no cells for acute myocardial infarction (AMI)
Patient or population: patients with AMI
 Settings: Hospitalised patients
 Intervention: cells
 Comparison: no cells
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No of participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
No cells Cells
All‐cause mortality ‐ short‐term follow‐up (< 12 months) Study population RR 0.80
 (0.43 to 1.49) 1365
 (17 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 MODERATE 1 Further research may change the estimate
28 per 1000 23 per 1000
 (12 to 42)
All‐cause mortality ‐ long‐term follow‐up (≥ 12 months) Study population RR 0.93
 (0.58 to 1.50) 996
 (14 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 MODERATE 1 Further research may change the estimate
70 per 1000 65 per 1000
 (41 to 105)
Cardiovascular mortality ‐ short‐term follow‐up (< 12 months) Study population RR 0.72
 (0.28 to 1.82) 290
 (7 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 MODERATE 1 Further research may change the estimate
54 per 1000 39 per 1000
 (15 to 99)
Cardiovascular mortality ‐ long‐term follow‐up (≥ 12 months) Study population RR 1.04
 (0.54 to 1.99) 527
 (9 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 MODERATE 1 Further research may change the estimate
72 per 1000 75 per 1000
 (39 to 143)
Composite death, reinfarction and hospitalisation for heart failure ‐ short‐term follow‐up (< 12 months) Study population RR 0.36
 (0.12 to 1.14) 379
 (3 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 MODERATE 1 Further research may change the estimate
66 per 1000 24 per 1000
 (8 to 76)
Composite death, reinfarction and hospitalisation for heart failure ‐ long‐term follow‐up (≥ 12 months) Study population RR 0.63
 (0.36 to 1.10) 497
 (6 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 MODERATE 1 Further research may change the estimate
140 per 1000 88 per 1000
 (51 to 154)
*The assumed risk is based on the observed incidence across the pooled control groups. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 CI: confidence interval; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1Imprecision: information size criterion not met. Small size effect.