Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 30;2015(9):CD006536. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006536.pub4

Jazi 2012.

Methods Type of study: parallel RCT
 Type of publication: full
 Source of funding: not reported
Country of origin: Iran
 Number of centres: 1
Dates of trial enrolment: 06/02 to 01/04
 Length of follow‐up: 6 months
 Number (N) of participants randomised to each arm: not reported
 Number (N) of participants analysed (primary outcome) in each arm: 16 in the treatment arm, 16 in the control arm
Participants Population: AMI within 1 month with a history of anterior MI and LVEF < 35%
 Age, mean (SD) each arm: 48.0 (SEM 2.5) years in treatment arm, 45.2 (SEM 3.2) years in control arm
 Sex, % male in each arm: 66% in treatment arm, 90% in control arm
Number of diseased vessels: 1
 Number of stunned hyperkinetic, etc segments: not reported
 Time from symptom onset to initial treatment: up to 1 month
 Statistically significant baseline imbalances between the groups?: none
Interventions Intervention arm: BMMNC
 Type of stem cells: bone marrow‐derived stem cells (mononuclear cells‐MNC)
 Summary of how stem cells were isolated and type and route of delivery: bone marrow aspirates were obtained under local anaesthesia with a standard Jamshidi needle with heparin (50 U/mL) from posterior iliac crests. Bone marrow‐derived mononuclear cells (BMCs) were isolated by layering on a Ficoll‐Paque gradient. Cell populations included hematopoietic progenitor cells. A haemocytometer was used to estimate the number of nucleated cells in the final preparation of bone marrow cells. Nucleated cell viability was assessed by trypan blue exclusion. Nucleated cells were cultured in an M199 medium, 10% human serum supplemented with 50 ng/mL vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), 1 ng/mL basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and 2 ng/mL insulin‐like growth factor‐1 (IGF‐1). The cells were incubated overnight at 37 ºC in a fully humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. Then, cells were washed twice and re‐suspended in 5 mL human serum
 Dose of stem cells: (24.6 ± SEM 8.4) × 108 cells
Timing of stem cell procedure: within 1 month of AMI, at the time of PCI
Comparator arm: no additional therapy (control)
Outcomes Primary outcomes: not reported
 Secondary outcomes: perfusion defects, regional wall motion of LV and LVEF, adverse events
 Outcome assessment points: 6 months
 Method(s): SPECT, echocardiography
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk The trial was described as randomised but the method of randomisation was not reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Allocation concealment was not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Controls did not undergo bone marrow aspiration and no placebo was administered; neither participants nor patients were blinded. Blinding of outcome assessors was not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk The number of participants randomised to each treatment arm was unclear; the study states that 20 participants met the inclusion criteria but the analysis includes 16 participants in each group. It is therefore unclear how many patients were randomised to each treatment group. No details of patient withdrawal were reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk All outcomes mentioned in the methods were reported in the results, although echocardiography measurements taken at 1 month were not reported. It would be difficult to rule out other selective reporting
Other bias Low risk None reported or identified