TABLE 2.
Reactivity of whole treponema cells with T. pallidum MAbs and control T. socranskii MAbs following continuous culture in either mP4 or NOS medium
| Treponema | Reactivity with MAb aftera:
|
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mP4 culture
|
NOS culture
|
|||||||
| F5 | H9-2 | H9-1 | Control | F5 | H9-2 | H9-1 | Control | |
| OMZ-804 | Pos | Pos | Pos | Neg | Pos | +/− | Pos | Neg |
| OHSU 242-9 | Pos | Pos | Pos | Neg | +/− | Neg | +/− | Neg |
| OHSU 242-10 | Pos | Pos | Pos | Neg | +/− | Neg | +/− | Neg |
| OMZ-802 | Pos | Pos | Pos | Neg | +/− | Neg | +/− | Neg |
| OMZ-805 | Pos | Pos | Pos | Neg | +/− | Neg | +/− | Neg |
| T. maltophilum | Pos | Pos | Pos | Neg | +/− | Neg | Neg | Neg |
| T. denticola ST10 | Pos | Pos | Pos | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg |
| T. denticola ATCC 33520 | Pos | Pos | Pos | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg |
| T. pectinovorum | Pos | Pos | Pos | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg |
| T. vincentii ATCC 35580 | Pos | Pos | Pos | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg |
| T. medium | +/− | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg |
| T. denticola ATCC 33521 | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg |
| T. denticola ATCC 35404 | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg |
| T. denticola ATCC 35405 | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg |
| T. denticola GM-1 | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg |
| T. phagedenis | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg |
| T. socranskii subsp. buccale | Neg | Neg | Neg | Pos | Neg | Neg | Neg | Pos |
| T. socranskii subsp. paredis | Neg | Neg | Neg | NDb | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg |
| T. socranskii subsp. socranskii | Neg | Neg | Neg | Pos | Neg | Neg | Neg | Pos |
No stained cells were detected in negative (Neg) reactions. Some lightly stained cells were detected, but most cells were not stained, in weak (+/−) reactions. All, or nearly all, cells were well stained in positive (Pos) reactions.
ND, not determined.