Table 3.

Reporting on quality of included interventions (6 interventions reported in 11 articles included in the review

Author(s), Year	Selection bias (random sequence generation)	Selection bias (allocation concealment)	Performance bias	Detection bias (incomplete outcome data)	Reporting bias (selective reporting)	Other sources of bias	% risk
Lou et al. 2006 [36]	Unclear	High risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	28.6%
Odeny et al. 2012 [38]; Odeny et al. 2014 [34]	Low risk	High risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	14.3%
Rokicki et al. 2017 [15]; Rokicki & Fink, 2017 [14]	Low risk	High risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	14.3%
Winskell et al. 2018 [33]; Sabben et al. 2019 [44]	Low risk	High risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	14.3%
Ybarra et al. 2012 [39]; Ybarra et al. 2013 [40]; Ybarra et al. 2014 [35]	Low risk	High risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	14.3%
Zhu et al. 2019 [37]	Low risk	High risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	14.3%