Table 2.

Comparison of different electrochemical detection methods for pesticide detection.

Analyte	Electrode	Linear range (μmol/L)	Limit of detection (μmol/L)	Real sample	Refs.
Methyl-paraoxon, methyl-parathion and ethyl-paraoxon	TiO2@dopamine@serine/histamine/glutamic acid modified electrode	0.5–100	0.20	Vegetable (Lactuca sativa L.)	[32]
Paraoxon	Layer-by-layer assembled multi-enzyme/carbon nanotube biosensor	0.5–40	0.50	Apple	[37]
Carbaryl		10–80	10
Carbofuran	Gold nanoparticles and graphene oxide modified screen-printed carbon electrode	1.0–250	0.22	Cucumber and rice	[40]
Chlorpyrifos	Acetylcholinesterase immobilized screen-printed electrodes	1.0–50000	0.50	Milk	[60]
Imidacloprid	Molecularly imprinted polymers and graphene modified glassy carbon electrode	0.5–15	0.10	Rice	[61]
Methyl-paraoxon	CeO2 nanozyme-modified glassy carbon electrode	0.1–100	0.06	Herbal plant (Semen nelumbinis, Coix lacryma-jobi, Adenophora stricta)	This work