Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 25;12:664533. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.664533

Table 2.

Study characteristics of the subgroup analyses/main study comparing SGLT-2 inhibitors VS placebo in patients with T2DM and HF.

Study Intervention Sample size, n Age, years# Female sex, % Type of HF included HF status
CANVAS Canagliflozin 803 64.1 ± 8.3 43.1 Both preserved and reduced With history of HF, but not known if had existing HF.
Placebo 658 63.4 ± 8.3 45.9
DAPA-HF Dapagliflozin 1075 66.3 ± 9.9 22.3 Reduced only Existing HF
Placebo 1064 66.7 ± 9.8 22.3
DECLARE–TIMI 58 Dapagliflozin 318/908* NR NR Reduced only Including existing HF, with history of HF but without existing reduced EF
Placebo 353/1007 NR NR
EMPEROR-Reduced Empagliflozin 927 66.8 ± 10.0 22.7 Reduced only Existing HF
Placebo 929 66.6 ± 10.3 23.5
SOLOIST-WHF Sotagliflozin 608 69 (63-76) 32.6 Both preserved and reduced Diagnosis with HF ≥3 months prior to Screening, and with history of hospitalization for HF
Placebo 614 70 (64-76) 34.9

T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; HF, heart failure; NR, not reported; EF, ejection fraction.

*Existing HF only/Combined existing HF and with history of HF.

#Age was presented as mean ± SD or median (interquartile range).