Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 25;11:737767. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.737767

Table 5.

Sequential systemic treatments after failure of Lenvatinib or Sorafenib in the propensity score-matched cohort.

Variables All, n=210 Lenvatinib, n=70 Sorafenib, n=140 P-value
Treatment Ongoing, n (%) 16 (7.6) 12 (17.1) 4 (2.9) <0.001
Treatment Stop, n (%) 194 (92.4) 58 (82.9) 136 (97.1) <0.001
Post-treatment, n (%) 103 (53) 25 (43.1) 78 (57.4) 0.069
Second-line systemic treatment, n(%) 86 (44.3) 21 (36.2) 65 (47.8) 0.02
 Regorafenib 34 1 33
 Lenvatinib, 13 0 13
 Carbozantinib 3 2 1
 Nivolumab, 16 3 13
 Atezolizumab plus
 Bevacizumab
5 5 0
 Chemotherapy 12 9 3
 Others 3 1 2
Third-line systemic therapy, n (%) 21 (10) 2 (3.4) 19 (14)
 Regorafenib 2 0 2
 Lenvatinib 5 0 5
 Nivolumab 8 2 6
 Pembrolizumab 2 0 2
 Chemotherapy 4 0 4
Forth-line systemic therapy, n (%) 2 (0.9) 0 (0) 2 (1.5)
 Lenvatinib 1 0 1
 Nivolumab 1 0 1

The proportion was calculated in patients who stopped lenvatinib or sorafenib.

Others: Two patients received thalidomide and one patient received oral 5-Flurouracie, respectively.