Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 8;191(5):1959–1965. doi: 10.1007/s11845-021-02849-z

Table 3.

Comparison of respiratory muscle strength and pulmonary functions in volleyball players with COVID-19 and non-COVID-19

Parameters COVID-19 players (n = 17)
X ± SD
Non COVID-19 players (n = 25)
X ± SD
Means difference
95% CI
p
Pulmonary function test (L)
   FEV1 3.73 ± 0.54 3.79 ± 0.41 −0.06 (−0.36 to 0.24) 0.690
   FVC 4.47 ± 0.60 4.46 ± 0.54 0.01 (−0.35 to 0.37) 0.955
   PEF 6.11 ± 1.63 6.32 ± 1.18 −0.21 (−1.08 to 0.67) 0.633
   FEF25–75% 3.94 ± 1.02 4.10 ± 0.82 −0.17 (−0.74 to 0.41) 0.558
Pulmonary function test (%)
   FEV1 94.77 ± 12.15 98.12 ± 9.46 −3.36 (−10.10 to 3.39) 0.321
   FVC 96.65 ± 10.37 99.80 ± 9.41 −3.15 (−9.38 to 3.08) 0.313
   FEV1/FVC 97.41 ± 9.74 98.04 ± 7.60 −0.63 (−6.04 to 4.78) 0.816
   PEF 76.00 ± 18.06 80.00 ± 14.62 −4.00 (−14.22 to 6.22) 0.434
   FEF25–75% 96.82 ± 23.26 99.96 ± 20.86 −2.13 (−16.02 to 11.75) 0.757
Respiratory muscle strength
   MIP (cmH2O) 80.12 ± 22.22 97.00 ± 13.74 −16.88 (−29.36 to −4.41) 0.010*
   MIP (%) 87.36 ± 25.20 103.63 ± 14.02 −16.28 (−30.20 to −2.36) 0.024*
   MEP (cmH2O) 89.59 ± 29.47 106.64 ± 20.34 −17.05 (−33.95 to −0.15) 0.048*
   MEP (%) 56.99 ± 19.02 67.03 ± 12.77 −10.03 (−20.88 to 0.81) 0.068

Descriptive analyses were expressed using (X ± SD) for normally distributed variables

FEV1 forced expiratory volume in the first second, FVC forced vital capacity, FEV1/FVC forced expiratory volume in the first second/forced vital capacity, PEF peak expiratory flow, FEF25–25% forced expiratory flow from 25 to 75%, MIP maximal inspiratory pressure, MEP maximal expiratory pressure, cmH2O centimeter water, % percent, CI confidence interval, SD standard deviation

Student’s t test *p < 0.05