Table 3.
Potential predictors for postoperative outcome, resection and recession length by correlation analysis for the whole sample (r Pearson, 95% CI)
| Postoperative deviaton | Preoperative deviation | Age | Strabismus type | Amblyopia degree | EOM recession (mm) | EOM resection (mm) | LRM tendon width | MRM tendon width | LRM insertion | MRM insertion | |
| Postoperative deviation | 1 | 0.91* 0.88, 0.93 |
0.13 −0.02, 0.28 |
0.12 −0.01, 0.26 |
0.21* 0.08, 0.35 |
0.23* 0.11, 0.33 |
0.16† 0.02, 0.29 |
0.08 −0.04, 0.2 |
0.09 −0.03, 0.22 |
0.11 −0.03, 0.26 |
0.14† −0.00, 0.28 |
| Preoperative deviation | 1 | 0.29* 0.14, 0.42 |
0.21* 0.08, 0.34 |
0.29* 0.15, 0.43 |
0.20* 0.08, 0.32 |
0.36* 0.24, 0.47 |
0.074 −0.06, 0.2 |
0.14† 0.02, 0.28 |
0.17* 0.04, 0.32 |
0.09* 0.06, 0.33 |
|
| Age | 1 | 0.59* 0.49, 0.69 |
0.17† 0.03, 0.31 |
0.05 0.19, 0.09 |
0.64* 0.56, 0.71 |
0.14† −0.01, 0.29 |
0.02 −0.09, 0.14 |
0.41* 0.3, 0.52 |
0.42* 0.29, 0.53 |
||
| Strabismus type | 1 | 0.08 0.2, 0.05 |
0.03 −0.13, 0.18 |
0.49* 0.38, 0.6 |
0.16† 0.02, 0.3 |
0.03 0.15, 0.1 |
0.43* 0.31, 0.54 |
0.37* 0.24, 0.49 |
|||
| Amblyopia degree | 1 | 0.03 −0.15, 0.21 |
0.18* 0.03, 0.31 |
0.03 −0.12, 0.18 |
0.19* 0.06, 0.33 |
0.11 −0.01, 0.23 |
0.08 −0.04, 0.2 |
||||
| EOM recession | 1 | 0.44* 0.54,–0.33 |
0.07 −0.06, 0.19 |
0.07 0.21, 0.07 |
0.13 −0.01, 0.27 |
0.08 −0.06, 0.22 |
|||||
| EOM resection | 1 | 0.09 −0.05, 0.22 |
0.09 −0.05, 0.21 |
0.27* 0.16, 0.4 |
0.28* 0.16, 0.4 |
||||||
| LRM tendon width | 1 | 0.03 0.17, 0.11 |
0.19* 0.06, 0.31 |
0.13 0.01, 0.26 |
|||||||
| MRM tendon width | 1 | 0.11 −0.02, 0.24 |
0.044 −0.1, 0.18 |
||||||||
| LRM insertion | 1 | 0.81* 0.76, 0.86 |
|||||||||
| MRM insertion | 1 |
Nr = 216.
*Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two tailed).
†Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (two tailed).
EOM, extraocular muscle; LRM, lateral rectus muscle; MRM, medial rectus muscle.