Abstract
Introduction
Obstructive lung diseases (asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)) and smoking are associated with greater risk of respiratory infections and hospitalisations, but conflicting data exist regarding their association with severity of COVID-19, and few studies have evaluated whether these associations differ by age.
Objectives
To examine the associations between asthma, COPD and smoking on the severity of COVID-19 among a cohort of hospitalised patients, and to test for effect modification by age.
Methods
We performed a retrospective analysis of electronic health record data of patients admitted to Massachusetts General Hospital, assigning the maximal WHO Clinical Progression Scale score for each patient during the first 28 days following hospital admission. Using ordered logistic regression, we measured the association between maximal severity score and asthma, COPD and smoking and their interaction with age.
Measurements and main results
Among 1391 patients hospitalised with COVID-19, we found an increased risk of severe disease among patients with COPD and prior smoking, independent of age. We also found evidence of effect modification by age with asthma and current smoking; in particular, asthma was associated with decreased COVID-19 severity among older adults, and current smoking was associated with decreased severity among younger patients.
Conclusions
This cohort study identifies age as a modifying factor for the association between asthma and smoking on severity of COVID-19. Our findings highlight the complexities of determining risk factors for COVID-19 severity, and suggest that the effect of risk factors may vary across the age spectrum.
Keywords: COPD epidemiology, tobacco and the lung, viral infection, asthma epidemiology
Key messages.
How does age affect the severity of COVID-19 in patients with a history of obstructive lung disease and smoking?
Asthma is associated with decreased COVID-19 severity among older adults, and current smoking is associated with decreased severity among younger patients.
To our knowledge, this is the first study to specifically examine how age might affect the relationship between the most common lung diseases, smoking and COVID-19 severity. Our findings suggest that the effect of commonly identified risk factors may vary across the age spectrum.
Introduction
The majority of severe COVID-19 and COVID-19-related deaths occur among those with comorbidities, including those with chronic respiratory disease.1 2 The United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention currently classifies chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, moderate-to-severe asthma and current and former smoking as associated with increased risk of severe COVID-19 complications.3 4 Though the majority of deaths due to COVID-19 occur among older adults, chronic respiratory diseases may increase the risk of severe outcomes even among younger patients. In the spring 2020 surge, chronic respiratory diseases were present in 20.9% of people under age 65 who died of COVID-19 in the USA through 18 May 2020,5 and a large study in the UK found that 20.9% of patients aged 16–49 and 44.4% of those aged 50–69 hospitalised with COVID-19 were diagnosed with asthma.6 By contrast, in a large cohort of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 in China, only 2.8% of patients had chronic respiratory disease.7
Since viruses (including non-SARS coronaviruses) are associated with both asthma and COPD exacerbations,8 9 patients with either obstructive lung disease would be expected to have a higher rate of severe outcomes due to COVID-19. Despite initial reports of low prevalence of asthma among patients hospitalised with COVID-19 in China,10 investigators have reported prolonged intubation course among asthmatics,11 increased risk of death among asthmatics with recent oral corticosteroid use,2 and worse clinical outcomes, especially among those with non-allergic asthma.12 Multiple studies have also reported increased risk of death among patients with COPD, with an even greater risk among men.13
Smoking increases the risk of acquiring respiratory infections14 15 by impairing macrophage and cytokine responses and upregulating pathogen receptors.16–20 It is the primary risk factor for developing COPD, and contributes to development and exacerbations of asthma.21–24 Smoking is also associated with upregulation of the ACE-2 receptor in airways, raising concerns early in the pandemic regarding increased entry of SARS-CoV-2 into host cells.25–28 An initial report from patients in Wuhan in December/January 2019 noted that patients with a history of smoking had significantly increased odds of disease progression,29 but subsequent meta-analyses have reported lower-than-expected prevalence of smoking among hospitalised patients with COVID-19.30 31
To better understand the relative contributions of obstructive lung disease and smoking on the severity of COVID-19 across the age spectrum, we analysed data from the first 1391 patients admitted to Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) with COVID-19. We hypothesised that obstructive lung diseases and smoking would be associated with severe COVID-19 disease, and that these associations would be greater among older patients.
Methods
Study design and data sources
We performed a retrospective analysis of electronic health record data of patients admitted to MGH between 11 March and 3 June 2020. Demographic, hospitalisation, laboratory and body mass index (BMI) data were extracted from the MGH Enterprise Data Warehouse using structured query language procedures. Clinical data, including medical history, treatments in the hospital and outcomes were manually abstracted by trained chart reviewers and entered into a Redcap (Research Electronic Data Capture) database hosted on a MassGeneral Brigham server.32
Population
We included all patients in the MGH COVID-19 Registry, a cohort of children and adults with positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing who were inpatients during the study period and had 28-day outcome data available at the time of the analysis.33 The inclusion criteria for the cohort were (1) any positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test, infection flag that indicates COVID-19 infection, or ICD-10 diagnosis of U07.1, and (2) at least one hospitalisation at MGH with an admission date within 45 days after criterion (1). Patients who did not satisfy these criteria were excluded.
Variable definitions
Demographic data and medical history (including prior diagnoses of asthma and COPD) were obtained from the health record. BMI was calculated from height and weight measured within ±14 days of hospitalisation. We used results of laboratory testing closest to the time of admission to the hospital.
The primary outcome used for this analysis is the WHO Clinical Progression Scale (WHO CPS), which was developed to measure the full range of disease severity and progression in COVID-19 disease.34 While the scale as created ranges from 0 (uninfected) to 10 (dead), our analysis focuses on severity of illness among hospitalised patients and therefore only includes WHO CPS scores 4 and higher (moderate and severe disease, see table 1). We calculated the maximal WHO CPS for each patient during the first 28 days following hospital admission using the highest oxygen flow rate, fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), or mode of ventilatory support; and the presence of haemodialysis, vasopressor or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use reported in the registry. Because concurrent arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), arterial oxyhaemoglobin saturation (SpO2) and FiO2 data were not consistently available in the registry, we approximated the minimum SpO2/FiO2 ratio35 by using the maximal reported FiO2 and assuming an SpO2 of 90% based on the target SpO2 in the hospital’s standard mechanical ventilation order set and usual target for oxygen supplementation.
Table 1.
WHO CPS among hospitalised patients
| Patient state | Descriptor | Score |
| Hospitalised: moderate disease | Hospitalised; no oxygen therapy | 4 |
| Hospitalised; oxygen by mask or nasal prongs | 5 | |
| Hospitalised: severe disease | Hospitalised; oxygen by non-invasive ventilation or high flow | 6 |
| Intubation and mechanical ventilation with pO2/FiO2≥150 or SpO2/FiO2≥200 | 7 | |
| Mechanical ventilation with pO2/FiO2<150 (SpO2/FiO2<200) or vasopressors | 8 | |
| Mechanical ventilation, with pO2/FiO2<150 (SpO2/FiO2<200) and vasopressors, dialysis or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation | 9 | |
| Dead | Dead | 10 |
Adapted from Marshall et al.34
FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; pO2, partial pressure of oxygen; SpO2, arterial oxyhaemoglobin saturation; WHO CPS, WHO Clinical Progression Scale.
Statistical/analytic methods
After calculating descriptive statistics for major variables of interest, we measured the unadjusted association between potential predictors of disease severity (including the CDC underlying conditions on which data were available) and the WHO CPS using ordered logistic regression. We then constructed a multivariable model that included the variables of interest as well as demographic variables and cardiometabolic comorbidities. We also tested for effect modification creating two-way interaction terms between age and asthma, age and COPD and age and smoking. We estimated predicted probabilities of each WHO CPS level across age, at the mean level of each covariate, using the Stata margins and marginsplot commands. Standard errors and 95% CI were calculated using the delta method.36 37 Finally, we compared biomarkers of disease severity and host response between patients with and without asthma, between patients with and without COPD and among patients with varying exposures to smoking, using Wilcoxon rank-sum and Kruskal-Wallis tests as appropriate. All analyses were performed in Stata V.16.1 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas, USA).
Human subjects approval
The MGH COVID-19 registry was reviewed and approved by the MassGeneral Brigham Human Research Committee (#2020P000829). The present analysis was reviewed and determined to be exempt.
Patient and public involvement
Patients were not directly involved in the design of this data analysis, though the question of how obstructive lung diseases and smoking affect COVID-19 outcomes was raised by many of our patients and their families.
Results
We analysed data from 1391 patients who were hospitalised with COVID-19 and had complete 28-day outcome data. Baseline characteristics of the study population are summarised in the first column of table 2. Patients ranged in age from newborn to 99 years (mean age: 59 years), were predominantly men (57%), and were primarily white or Hispanic. The majority (78%) of patients were overweight or obese and 76% had a cardiac or metabolic disorder. Among all admitted patients, 22% (301/1391) had a prior diagnosis of obstructive lung disease: asthma (158/1391), COPD (119/1391) or both (24/1391). The majority of patients were either never (55.9%) or previous smokers (29.0%); 102 (7%)/1391 reported currently smoking. Six (0.4%) patients reported current use of electronic nicotine delivery systems. Inhaled corticosteroid use was common among both patients with asthma (40.1%) and COPD (43.4%).
Table 2.
Demographic and clinical characteristics by WHO Clinical Progression Score
| Total | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | P value | |
| N=1391 | n=362 | n=553 | n=17 | n=11 | n=96 | n=180 | n=172 | ||
| Age (years) | 59.0 (18.7) | 52.8 (20.3) | 59.0 (18.0) | 62.3 (17.2) | 50.2 (17.8) | 57.7 (16.9) | 56.9 (13.2) | 75.5 (13.2) | <0.001 |
| Sex | 0.0015 | ||||||||
| Male | 795 (100%) | 196 (25%) | 297 (37%) | 11 (1%) | 7 (1%) | 53 (7%) | 116 (15%) | 115 (14%) | |
| Female | 596 (100%) | 166 (28%) | 256 (43%) | 6 (1%) | 4 (1%) | 43 (7%) | 64 (11%) | 57 (10%) | |
| Race/ethnicity | 0.0458 | ||||||||
| White | 550 (100%) | 137 (25%) | 220 (40%) | 5 (1%) | 3 (1%) | 30 (5%) | 49 (9%) | 106 (19%) | |
| Black/African American | 149 (100%) | 52 (35%) | 48 (32%) | 3 (2%) | 3 (2%) | 9 (6%) | 18 (12%) | 16 (11%) | |
| Hispanic | 492 (100%) | 132 (27%) | 205 (42%) | 9 (2%) | 5 (1%) | 37 (8%) | 79 (16%) | 25 (5%) | |
| Other | 84 (100%) | 23 (27%) | 30 (36%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 10 (12%) | 13 (15%) | 8 (10%) | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 30.1 (7.0) | 28.6 (6.2) | 30.7 (6.9) | 28.7 (5.3) | 26.9 (7.0) | 30.4 (6.8) | 32.3 (7.2) | 29.5 (8.0) | 0.0003 |
| BMI category (kg/m2) | 0.0594 | ||||||||
| <25 | 274 (100%) | 90 (33%) | 94 (34%) | 4 (1%) | 3 (1%) | 17 (6%) | 22 (8%) | 44 (16%) | |
| 25.0–29.9 | 411 (100%) | 118 (29%) | 171 (42%) | 5 (1%) | 4 (1%) | 27 (7%) | 40 (10%) | 46 (11%) | |
| 30.0–34.9 | 302 (100%) | 67 (22%) | 126 (42%) | 3 (1%) | 0 (0%) | 24 (8%) | 49 (16%) | 33 (11%) | |
| 35.0–39.9 | 147 (100%) | 30 (20%) | 71 (48%) | 2 (1%) | 0 (0%) | 8 (5%) | 24 (16%) | 12 (8%) | |
| >40 | 114 (100%) | 20 (18%) | 51 (45%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1%) | 9 (8%) | 20 (18%) | 13 (11%) | |
| Smoking history | <0.001 | ||||||||
| Never | 777 (100%) | 226 (29%) | 315 (41%) | 9 (1%) | 6 (1%) | 54 (7%) | 103 (13%) | 64 (8%) | |
| Yes—past | 404 (100%) | 73 (18%) | 166 (41%) | 8 (2%) | 2 (0%) | 25 (6%) | 48 (12%) | 82 (20%) | |
| Yes—current | 102 (100%) | 44 (43%) | 34 (33%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (2%) | 6 (6%) | 7 (7%) | 9 (9%) | |
| Unknown | 108 (100%) | 19 (18%) | 38 (35%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1%) | 11 (10%) | 22 (20%) | 17 (16%) | |
| Asthma | 0.0329 | ||||||||
| No | 1209 (100%) | 314 (26%) | 462 (38%) | 15 (1%) | 9 (1%) | 89 (7%) | 162 (13%) | 158 (13%) | |
| Yes | 182 (100%) | 48 (26%) | 91 (50%) | 2 (1%) | 2 (1%) | 7 (4%) | 18 (10%) | 14 (8%) | |
| COPD | 0.0006 | ||||||||
| No | 1248 (100%) | 346 (28%) | 477 (38%) | 17 (1%) | 10 (1%) | 90 (7%) | 173 (14%) | 135 (11%) | |
| Yes | 143 (100%) | 16 (11%) | 76 (53%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1%) | 6 (4%) | 7 (5%) | 37 (26%) | |
| Bronchodilator use | 0.2180 | ||||||||
| No | 1169 (100%) | 312 (27%) | 459 (39%) | 14 (1%) | 6 (1%) | 82 (7%) | 165 (14%) | 131 (11%) | |
| Yes | 222 (100%) | 50 (23%) | 94 (42%) | 3 (1%) | 5 (2%) | 14 (6%) | 15 (7%) | 41 (18%) | |
| Inhaled corticosteroid use | 0.7889 | ||||||||
| No | 1239 (100%) | 327 (26%) | 485 (39%) | 17 (1%) | 10 (1%) | 84 (7%) | 165 (13%) | 151 (12%) | |
| Yes | 152 (100%) | 35 (23%) | 68 (45%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1%) | 12 (8%) | 15 (10%) | 21 (14%) | |
| Montelukast use | 0.6712 | ||||||||
| No | 1372 (100%) | 356 (26%) | 545 (40%) | 17 (1%) | 11 (1%) | 96 (7%) | 179 (13%) | 168 (12%) | |
| Yes | 19 (100%) | 6 (32%) | 8 (42%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (5%) | 4 (21%) | |
| Any cardiac/metabolic disorder | <0.001 | ||||||||
| No | 334 (100%) | 132 (40%) | 127 (38%) | 0 (0%) | 6 (2%) | 20 (6%) | 38 (11%) | 11 (3%) | |
| Yes | 1057 (100%) | 230 (22%) | 426 (40%) | 17 (2%) | 5 (0%) | 76 (7%) | 142 (13%) | 161 (15%) | |
| Coronary artery disease/myocardial infarction | 0.0008 | ||||||||
| No | 1180 (100%) | 322 (27%) | 463 (39%) | 15 (1%) | 9 (1%) | 87 (7%) | 166 (14%) | 118 (10%) | |
| Yes | 211 (100%) | 40 (19%) | 90 (43%) | 2 (1%) | 2 (1%) | 9 (4%) | 14 (7%) | 54 (26%) | |
| Heart failure | <0.001 | ||||||||
| No | 1227 (100%) | 333 (27%) | 491 (40%) | 11 (1%) | 11 (1%) | 86 (7%) | 170 (14%) | 125 (10%) | |
| Yes | 164 (100%) | 29 (18%) | 62 (38%) | 6 (4%) | 0 (0%) | 10 (6%) | 10 (6%) | 47 (29%) | |
| Hypertension | <0.001 | ||||||||
| No | 694 (100%) | 231 (33%) | 262 (38%) | 6 (1%) | 7 (1%) | 48 (7%) | 92 (13%) | 48 (7%) | |
| Yes | 697 (100%) | 131 (19%) | 291 (42%) | 11 (2%) | 4 (1%) | 48 (7%) | 88 (13%) | 124 (18%) | |
| Diabetes | <0.001 | ||||||||
| No | 941 (100%) | 280 (30%) | 377 (40%) | 15 (2%) | 7 (1%) | 53 (6%) | 113 (12%) | 96 (10%) | |
| Yes | 450 (100%) | 82 (18%) | 176 (39%) | 2 (0%) | 4 (1%) | 43 (10%) | 67 (15%) | 76 (17%) | |
| Kidney disease | <0.001 | ||||||||
| No | 1132 (100%) | 313 (28%) | 455 (40%) | 15 (1%) | 10 (1%) | 79 (7%) | 155 (14%) | 105 (9%) | |
| Yes | 233 (100%) | 47 (20%) | 89 (38%) | 2 (1%) | 0 (0%) | 15 (6%) | 23 (10%) | 57 (24%) |
Values indicate count (proportion) and mean (SD) as appropriate.
P values calculated using the Wald χ2 test in an ordered logistic regression model with a single predictor variable.
BMI, body mass index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Figure 1 demonstrates the distribution of the WHO CPS among the study population. Most patients (74%) required oxygen or other ventilator support during hospitalisation, and 12% died during the 28-day period of data review. The majority (69%) of patients were treated on hospital floors; 31% were admitted an intensive care unit (ICU) during their hospitalisation. On univariate analysis (table 2), we found a strong positive association between WHO CPS score and age, male sex, BMI, previous smoking, COPD, coronary artery disease (CAD), heart failure, hypertension, diabetes and chronic kidney disease. We found a negative unadjusted association between WHO CPS score and Hispanic ethnicity, asthma and current smoking. We did not find any significant association between WHO CPS score and prior use of inhaled bronchodilator medications, inhaled corticosteroids or montelukast.
Figure 1.
Distribution of WHO clinical progression scale.
We then estimated the association between asthma, COPD and smoking status with WHO CPS score in a multivariable model adjusting for relevant demographic and comorbidity covariates and interaction terms by age for the three risk factors of interest (online supplemental table 1). We found that a history of asthma was associated with an increased risk of requiring oxygen among younger patients and a reduced risk of severe disease among older patients (figure 2, pinteraction=0.006), that no significant effect modification was observed by age with COPD (figure 3, pinteraction=0.61), and that current smoking was associated with a reduced risk of severe disease among younger patients but not among older patients (figure 4, pinteraction=0.002). The effect of asthma on WHO CPS ranged from OR 1.51 (95% CI: 0.76 to 2.99) at age 20 to OR 0.44 (95% CI: 0.26 to 0.74) at age 80, and the effect of smoking ranged from OR 0.07 (95% CI: 0.02 to 0.26) at age 20 to OR 0.375 (95% CI: 0.66 to 3.59) at age 80 (see table 3). Other significant covariates in the multivariable model included age (OR: 1.02 (95% CI: 1.01 to 1.03)), female sex (OR: 0.71 (95% CI: 0.55 to 0.90)), BMI (OR: 1.06 (95%: 1.04 to 1.08)) and diabetes (OR: 1.37 (95% CI: 1.05 to 1.79)).
Figure 2.
Predicted probability of WHO CPS score levels by age and asthma. ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; HD, hemodialysis; VP, vasopressors; WHO CPS, WHO Clinical Progression Scale.
Figure 3.
Predicted probability of WHO CPS score levels by age and COPD. COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; VP, vasopressors; HD, hemodialysis; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; WHO CPS, WHO Clinical Progression Scale.
Figure 4.
Predicted probability of WHO CPS score levels by age and smoking status. ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; VP, vasopressors; HD, hemodialysis; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; WHO CPS, WHO Clinical Progression Scale.
Table 3.
OR for WHO CPS score for asthma, COPD and smoking across levels of age
| Asthma | COPD | Smoking | ||||
| Age (years) | OR | P value | OR | P value | OR | P value |
| 20 | 1.51 (0.76 to 2.99) | 0.232 | 3.40 (0.59 to 19.66) | 0.170 | 0.07 (0.02 to 0.26) | <0.001 |
| 30 | 1.23 (0.72 to 2.11) | 0.444 | 2.87 (0.68 to 12.22) | 0.153 | 0.12 (0.05 to 0.33) | <0.001 |
| 40 | 1.00 (0.66 to 1.51) | 0.982 | 2.42 (0.77 to 7.65) | 0.131 | 0.20 (0.10 to 0.42) | <0.001 |
| 50 | 0.81 (0.58 to 1.13) | 0.231 | 2.04 (0.86 to 4.84) | 0.104 | 0.34 (0.20 to 0.58) | <0.001 |
| 60 | 0.66 (0.48 to 0.92) | 0.004 | 1.72 (0.94 to 3.15) | 0.077 | 0.56 (0.34 to 0.93) | 0.024 |
| 70 | 0.54 (0.37 to 0.80) | 0.013 | 1.45 (0.95 to 2.23) | 0.088 | 0.93 (0.50 to 1.74) | 0.817 |
| 80 | 0.44 (0.26 to 0.74) | 0.002 | 1.23 (0.78 to 1.92) | 0.375 | 1.54 (0.66 to 3.59) | 0.321 |
OR and 95% CIs calculated from ordered logistic regression model adjusting for age, sex, race, asthma, age × asthma, COPD, age × COPD, smoking, age × smoking, body mass index, coronary artery disease, heart failure, hypertension, diabetes and chronic kidney disease.
COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; WHO CPS, WHO Clinical Progression Scale.
bmjresp-2021-001038supp001.pdf (13.6KB, pdf)
To further characterise the effects of asthma, COPD and smoking on the host response to SARS-CoV-2 infection, we compared laboratory testing at the time of hospital admission between patients with and without asthma, between patients with and without COPD and among patients across categories of smoking history (table 4). We observed an increased absolute lymphocyte count and reduced levels of inflammatory markers (ferritin, CRP, ESR and procalcitonin) among patients with asthma and among patients who reported currently smoking. Patients with COPD also had reduced levels of inflammatory markers but increased markers of cardiovascular stress (troponin, D-dimer and NT-proBNP).
Table 4.
Laboratory test values at the time of admission
| Total | Asthma | COPD | Smoking | |||||||||
| Yes | No | P value | Yes | No | P value | Yes—current (in past 30 days) |
Yes—past | Never | Unknown | P value | ||
| N=1391 | n=182 | n=1209 | n=143 | n=1248 | n=102 | n=404 | n=777 | n=108 | ||||
| White blood cell count (×1000) |
6.78 (5.11 to 9.23) |
6.96 (4.95 to 9.04) |
6.76 (5.13 to 9.23) |
0.94 | 6.34 (4.84 to 8.38) |
6.82 (5.15 to 9.24) |
0.057 | 6.81 (5.21 to 9.05) |
6.80 (5.11 to 9.14) |
6.71 (5.07 to 9.25) |
7.27 (5.31 to 9.32) |
0.74 |
| Absolute lymphocyte count (K/μL) | 0.98 (0.67 to 1.41) |
1.06 (0.74 to 1.54) |
0.96 (0.66 to 1.39) |
0.022 | 0.82 (0.53 to 1.32) |
1.00 (0.69 to 1.42) |
0.001 | 1.10 (0.75 to 1.87) |
0.89 (0.60 to 1.28) |
1.03 (0.72 to 1.42) |
0.95 (0.66 to 1.29) |
<0.001 |
| Haemoglobin (g/dL) | 13.3 (12.0 to 14.5) |
13.3 (12.1 to 14.6) |
13.3 (12.0 to 14.5) |
0.92 | 12.6 (10.8 to 13.9) |
13.4 (12.1 to 14.6) |
<0.001 | 12.9 (11.5 to 14.3) |
13.2 (11.5 to 14.7) |
13.3 (12.1 to 14.4) |
14.0 (12.6 to 15.1) |
0.002 |
| Platelets (K/μL) | 203 (156 to 264) |
201 (156 to 257) |
203 (156 to 264) |
0.81 | 189 (153 to 236) |
207 (157 to 265) |
0.034 | 208 (154 to 268) |
193 (148 to 265) |
207 (159 to 264) |
199 (162 to 260) |
0.18 |
| Lactate (mmol/L) | 1.5 (1.1 to 2.1) |
1.4 (1.0 to 2.0) |
1.5 (1.2 to 2.1) |
0.080 | 1.4 (1.0 to 1.7) |
1.5 (1.2 to 2.1) |
0.007 | 1.6 (1.1 to 2.7) |
1.5 (1.2 to 2.0) |
1.5 (1.1 to 2.1) |
1.7 (1.1 to 2.2) |
0.37 |
| Anion gap (mmol/L) | 15 (14 to 17) |
15 (14 to 16) |
15 (14 to 17) |
0.039 | 15 (13 to 17) |
15 (14 to 17) |
0.002 | 14 (13 to 17) |
15 (14 to 17) |
15 (14 to 17) |
16 (14 to 18) |
0.008 |
| BUN (mg/dL) | 14 (10 to 22) |
12 (9 to 17) |
15 (10 to 23) |
<0.001 | 21 (16 to 33) |
14 (9 to 21) |
<0.001 | 15 (11 to 22) |
19 (13 to 30) |
12 (9 to 19) |
13 (9 to 20) |
<0.001 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.95 (0.78 to 1.28) |
0.86 (0.72 to 1.05) |
0.97 (0.79 to 1.30) |
<0.001 | 1.13 (0.90 to 1.65) |
0.93 (0.77 to 1.22) |
<0.001 | 0.98 (0.79 to 1.28) |
1.07 (0.86 to 1.56) |
0.90 (0.73 to 1.13) |
0.91 (0.79 to 1.25) |
<0.001 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 124 (106 to 161) |
118 (103 to 165) |
125 (106 to 161) |
0.23 | 117 (103 to 149) |
126 (106 to 162) |
0.013 | 115 (99 to 145) |
127 (107 to 163) |
124 (106 to 159) |
129 (109 to 191) |
0.021 |
| Haemoglobin A1C (%) | 6.5 (6.0 to 8.4) |
6.8 (5.8 to 8.4) |
6.5 (6.0 to 8.4) |
0.71 | 6.9 (6.2 to 9.0) |
6.5 (6.0 to 8.4) |
0.42 | 6.8 (6.0 to 8.4) |
6.5 (6.0 to 8.4) |
6.5 (6.0 to 8.3) |
6.8 (5.9 to 9.9) |
0.96 |
| LDH (U/L) | 314 (242 to 419) |
305 (231 to 393) |
315 (243 to 422) |
0.24 | 288 (214 to 370) |
318 (245 to 427) |
<0.001 | 262 (212 to 361) |
312 (240 to 399) |
315 (244 to 423) |
381 (284 to 520) |
<0.001 |
| Ferritin (μg/L) | 512 (242 to 1027) |
408 (189 to 719) |
546 (256 to 1058) |
<0.001 | 296 (150 to 793) |
540 (260 to 1048) |
<0.001 | 330 (110 to 1047) |
552 (237 to 1075) |
496 (257 to 967) |
682 (395 to 1205) |
0.002 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 72.6 (30.8 to 143.4) |
63.0 (28.1 to 125.0) |
73.8 (32.4 to 144.3) |
0.025 | 56.4 (20.8 to 113.7) |
74.1 (32.5 to 145.3) |
0.003 | 42.5 (9.3 to 117.5) |
71.8 (32.5 to 140.1) |
74.5 (33.2 to 143.4) |
105.9 (36.6 to 155.6) |
<0.001 |
| ESR (mm/hour) | 39 (23 to 60) |
36 (21 to 54) |
39 (23 to 61) |
0.086 | 37 (22 to 54) |
39 (23 to 60) |
0.67 | 31 (13 to 54) |
38 (25 to 59) |
39 (23 to 61) |
44 (28 to 61) |
0.010 |
| Procalcitonin (ng/mL) | 0.15 (0.09 to 0.30) |
0.13 (0.07 to 0.20) |
0.15 (0.09 to 0.34) |
<0.001 | 0.17 (0.09 to 0.29) |
0.14 (0.09 to 0.30) |
0.46 | 0.11 (0.06 to 0.31) |
0.17 (0.10 to 0.35) |
0.13 (0.09 to 0.26) |
0.18 (0.09 to 0.36) |
0.001 |
| IL-6 (pg/mL) | 26.6 (12.9 to 57.6) |
17.6 (6.9 to 42.2) |
28.6 (14.3 to 63.6) |
0.008 | 16.9 (14.5 to 44) |
28.6 (12.6 to 60.6) |
0.19 | 22.3 (11.6 to 77.2) |
27.1 (12.2 to 63.2) |
25.4 (13.3 to 54.8) |
35.4 (17.3 to 139.25) |
0.59 |
| Troponin (ng/L) | 11 (0 to 31) |
8 (0 to 17) |
12 (0 to 33) |
<0.001 | 27 (16 to 56) |
10 (0 to 25) |
<0.001 | 12 (0 to 36) |
22 (10 to 44) |
8 (0 to 20) |
10 (0 to 24) |
<0.001 |
| D-dimer (ng/mL) | 1020 (658 to 1854) |
874 (592 to 1440) |
1059 (678 to 1917) |
0.005 | 1400 (812 to 2334) |
987 (643 to 1770) |
<0.001 | 868 (473 to 1514) |
1172 (709 to 1925) |
981 (627 to 1767) |
1224 (773 to 2209) |
0.008 |
| NT-proBNP (pg/mL) | 259 (68 to 1190) |
191 (38 to 880) |
267 (70 to 1233) |
0.37 | 598 (230 to 2349) |
203 (57 to 1005) |
<0.001 | 350 (112 to 1745) |
503 (142 to 2469) |
143 (47 to 562) |
207 (69 to 1766) |
<0.001 |
Median and IQR are reported. P values reflect between-group or among-group comparisons using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test (for asthma and COPD) or the Kruskal-Wallis test (for smoking).
COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; IL-6, interleukin-6.
Discussion
In this cohort of 1391 hospitalised patients with COVID-19, we found evidence of significant effect modification of the association between asthma, smoking and COVID-19 severity by age. In particular, we found that asthma was associated with decreased COVID-19 severity among older patients, and that current smoking was associated with decreased severity among younger patients. We found an increased risk of severe disease among patients with COPD and prior smoking, independent of age. We also noted differences in inflammatory biomarkers between patients with and without asthma and across smoking statuses. We did not find any evidence of association between use of bronchodilators, inhaled corticosteroids or montelukast prior to hospitalisation and COVID-19 severity.
Our findings extend prior studies that have evaluated the relationship between obstructive lung diseases, smoking and COVID-19 outcomes. While other studies have reported associations between both asthma and COPD and severe COVID-19,6 7 to our knowledge this is the first analysis to specifically test for and identify effect modification by age. Our analysis may explain the variability of reports of the effects of asthma and smoking on COVID-19 severity. These findings raise the possibility of subgroup-specific effects of these risk factors and suggest that generalised statements regarding increased risk may be incomplete.
Several studies have suggested that asthma may be protective in some patients, including a Chicago study of 1003 patients with COVID-19 that reported lower rate of ARDS and death among those with asthma,11 and an analysis of a smaller cohort of patients with COVID-19 at our hospital that found a lower risk of ICU admission among those with asthma but no significant difference in risk of death compared with control patients without asthma.38 Two recent meta-analyses confirmed the lack of an association between presence of asthma and mortality,39 40 but two large studies in Korea and the UK reported that while asthma in general was not a risk factor for disease severity, asthma exacerbation within the past year was associated with an increased risk for death.2 41
The mechanism of the observed protective effect of asthma is unclear, and may be in part related to increased care seeking or a lower threshold for hospitalisation among patients with asthma. For example, patients with asthma may be more likely to be hospitalised for milder symptoms and therefore have lower WHO CPS scores. The effect of asthma on the severity of COVID-19 disease may likely be also determined by the underlying asthma phenotype and immunology of the host.42 Several investigators have postulated that the allergic phenotype may increase the risk of viral infection43 but may decrease the risk of the hyperimmune response that characterises severe disease.44 45 The severe asthma phenotype that is associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes may vary by atopy, age of onset, race/ethnicity and obesity.46 Obesity is associated with more severe and non-allergic asthma, through mechanisms that include altered pulmonary mechanics, adipokine changes, Th-1 and ILinterleukin-17-related airway inflammation,47–49 and our analysis confirmed the previously reported association between obesity and COVID-19 severity.50–52
The observed inverse correlation between current smoking status and COVID-19 severity adds to the existing literature regarding the association between current smoking and risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, disease severity and mortality.53–57 Our findings contrast with observations from other common respiratory pathogens, including Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, in which smoking has been associated with increased risk of both infection and mortality,58 59 influenza, in which history of smoking is associated with increased risk of hospital admission,60 and respiratory syncytial virus, in which maternal smoking is associated with increased risk of acute lower respiratory infection in children.61 Compared with former smokers and never smokers, current smoking is associated with an increased risk of death from pneumococcal pneumonia.62
Postulated mechanisms for a protective effect of current smoking include an inhibitory effect of nicotine on the production of proinflammatory cytokines and increased tolerance of airway or lung injury among current smokers.63–65 The clinical relevance of these hypotheses cannot be fully tested without accounting for potential confounders, including differences in behaviours leading to SARS-CoV-2 exposure, differences in thresholds for seeking testing, and access to healthcare. While we found evidence of age-specific effects of smoking, it is likely that the effects of smoking are also modified by other host factors that we did not examine, including amount of smoking, type of smoking, race/ethnicity and genetics.
Our study does not address several important questions relating to the effects of obstructive lung disease and smoking on COVID-19 outcomes. First, our cohort is limited to inpatients with COVID-19 and is therefore unable to assess the effect of these risk factors on becoming infected with SARS-CoV-2 or developing mild disease. The small number of children included in the sample (n=16), all of whom were non-smokers, also limits our ability to draw conclusions about children. Second, because the WHO CPS focuses on supportive measures provided during hospitalisation, decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatment including mechanical ventilation, vasopressor support or renal replacement therapy may bias the score downward for some severely ill patients.34 Because of institutional infection control practice patterns, few patients were treated with high-flow oxygen or non-invasive ventilation (WHO CPS 6), and most patients with cute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) ultimately developed either severe ARDS or required vasopressors (WHO CPS 8 or higher), which limits our ability to draw conclusions regarding WHO CPS scores 6 and 7. Third, our analysis relies on accurate reporting and abstraction of data from the medical record; these data may inaccurate or incomplete, especially for patients who did not previously receive their care within the MassGeneral Brigham system. Finally, the presence or absence of obstructive lung disease was determined based on diagnoses present during chart review, which is subject to underdiagnosis, overdiagnosis and misdiagnosis.66 67 In addition, we were unable to characterise or stratify by severity of obstructive lung disease or duration and amount of smoking, which may affect the severity of COVID-19. Further studies are required to evaluate these factors and to test for other potential effect modifiers, including asthma phenotype, the nature of inflammatory responses, and the effects of asthma/COPD treatment. In addition, future studies should examine the effects of these risk factors on the long-term sequelae of COVID-19.
Conclusion
In summary, this study identifies age as a modifying factor for the association between asthma and smoking on severity of COVID-19. Our findings highlight the complexities of determining risk factors for COVID-19 severity, and suggest that predicting disease severity based on single risk factors may not be appropriate.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the dedicated manual chart reviewers and data managers for their efforts in creating the MGH COVID-19 Registry.
Footnotes
Contributors: Drafting of the manuscript and statistical analysis was done by PPM, who is also guarantor of the study. Conception and design was done by PPM, DH, and TBK. Acquisition of the data was done by VAT, ASF, IB and ML. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content was performed by ML, DH, LMY, JL, ET, AAB, VAT, ASF, IVB, PLH and TBK.
Funding: The authors report the following funding sources: The National Institutes of Health: K23ES030399-03 (PPM), R37AI058736-16S1 (IVB), 5K08HL143183 (LY); Weissman Family MGH Research Scholar (IB); the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (YONKER18Q0 to LMY); and R01HL132786 and R01AG062393 (VAT). This work was conducted with support from Harvard Catalyst, The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health Award UL 1TR002541) and financial contributions from Harvard University and its affiliated academic healthcare centers. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of Harvard Catalyst, Harvard University and its affiliated academic healthcare centers, or the National Institutes of Health.
Competing interests: Dr Moschovis is a member of an adjudication committee for Pfizer.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material: This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.
Data availability statement
Data are available upon reasonable request. Data requests will be reviewed by the MGH COVID Registry.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
References
- 1.Stokes EK, Zambrano LD, Anderson KN, et al. Coronavirus Disease 2019 Case Surveillance - United States, January 22-May 30, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020;69:759–65. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6924e2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Williamson EJ, Walker AJ, Bhaskaran K, et al. Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY. Nature 2020;584:430–6. 10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Certain medical conditions and risk for severe COVID-19 illness, 2021. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/people-with-medical-conditions.html [Accessed 3 May 2021]. [PubMed]
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Science brief: evidence used to update the list of underlying medical conditions that increase a person’s risk of severe illness from COVID-19, 2021. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-briefs/underlying-evidence-table.html [Accessed 3 May 2021]. [PubMed]
- 5.Wortham JM, Lee JT, Althomsons S, et al. Characteristics of Persons Who Died with COVID-19 - United States, February 12-May 18, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020;69:923–9. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6928e1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bloom CI, Drake TM, Docherty AB, et al. Risk of adverse outcomes in patients with underlying respiratory conditions admitted to hospital with COVID-19: a national, multicentre prospective cohort study using the ISARIC who clinical characterisation protocol UK. Lancet Respir Med 2021;9:699–711. 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00013-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Guan W-J, Liang W-H, Shi Y, et al. Chronic respiratory diseases and the outcomes of COVID-19: a nationwide retrospective cohort study of 39,420 cases. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2021;9:2645–55. 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.02.041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zheng X-Y, Xu Y-J, Guan W-J, et al. Regional, age and respiratory-secretion-specific prevalence of respiratory viruses associated with asthma exacerbation: a literature review. Arch Virol 2018;163:845–53. 10.1007/s00705-017-3700-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bafadhel M, McKenna S, Terry S, et al. Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: identification of biologic clusters and their biomarkers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;184:662–71. 10.1164/rccm.201104-0597OC [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhang J-J, Dong X, Cao Y-Y, et al. Clinical characteristics of 140 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan, China. Allergy 2020;75:1730–41. 10.1111/all.14238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mahdavinia M, Foster KJ, Jauregui E, et al. Asthma prolongs intubation in COVID-19. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2020;8:2388–91. 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.05.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yang JM, Koh HY, Moon SY, et al. Allergic disorders and susceptibility to and severity of COVID-19: A nationwide cohort study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2020;146:790–8. 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.08.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rabbani G, Shariful Islam SM, Rahman MA, et al. Pre-existing COPD is associated with an increased risk of mortality and severity in COVID-19: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Respir Med 2021;15:705–16. 10.1080/17476348.2021.1866547 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nuorti JP, Butler JC, Farley MM, et al. Cigarette smoking and invasive pneumococcal disease. active bacterial core surveillance team. N Engl J Med 2000;342:681–9. 10.1056/NEJM200003093421002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Arcavi L, Benowitz NL. Cigarette smoking and infection. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:2206–16. 10.1001/archinte.164.20.2206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bozinovski S, Vlahos R, Zhang Y, et al. Carbonylation caused by cigarette smoke extract is associated with defective macrophage immunity. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2011;45:229–36. 10.1165/rcmb.2010-0272OC [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Feldman C, Anderson R. Cigarette smoking and mechanisms of susceptibility to infections of the respiratory tract and other organ systems. J Infect 2013;67:169–84. 10.1016/j.jinf.2013.05.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gaschler GJ, Zavitz CCJ, Bauer CMT, et al. Cigarette smoke exposure attenuates cytokine production by mouse alveolar macrophages. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2008;38:218–26. 10.1165/rcmb.2007-0053OC [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hocking WG, Golde DW. The pulmonary-alveolar macrophage (first of two parts). N Engl J Med 1979;301:580–7. 10.1056/NEJM197909133011104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Phipps JC, Aronoff DM, Curtis JL, et al. Cigarette smoke exposure impairs pulmonary bacterial clearance and alveolar macrophage complement-mediated phagocytosis of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Infect Immun 2010;78:1214–20. 10.1128/IAI.00963-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Buist AS, Vollmer WM, McBurnie MA. Worldwide burden of COPD in high- and low-income countries. Part I. The burden of obstructive lung disease (BOLD) initiative. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2008;12:703–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Coogan PF, Castro-Webb N, Yu J, et al. Active and passive smoking and the incidence of asthma in the black women's health study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015;191:168–76. 10.1164/rccm.201406-1108OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gilliland FD, Islam T, Berhane K, et al. Regular smoking and asthma incidence in adolescents. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;174:1094–100. 10.1164/rccm.200605-722OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Strachan DP, Butland BK, Anderson HR. Incidence and prognosis of asthma and wheezing illness from early childhood to age 33 in a national British cohort. BMJ 1996;312:1195–9. 10.1136/bmj.312.7040.1195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Leung JM, Yang CX, Tam A, et al. ACE-2 expression in the small airway epithelia of smokers and COPD patients: implications for COVID-19. Eur Respir J 2020;55:2000688. 10.1183/13993003.00688-2020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cai G, Bossé Y, Xiao F, et al. Tobacco smoking increases the lung gene expression of ACE2, the receptor of SARS-CoV-2. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020;201:1557–9. 10.1164/rccm.202003-0693LE [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Brake SJ, Barnsley K, Lu W, et al. Smoking upregulates angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 receptor: a potential adhesion site for novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19). J Clin Med 2020;9:841. 10.3390/jcm9030841 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Saheb Sharif-Askari N, Saheb Sharif-Askari F, Alabed M, et al. Airways expression of SARS-CoV-2 receptor, ACE2, and TMPRSS2 is lower in children than adults and increases with smoking and COPD. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev 2020;18:1–6. 10.1016/j.omtm.2020.05.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Liu W, Tao Z-W, Wang L, et al. Analysis of factors associated with disease outcomes in hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus disease. Chin Med J 2020;133:1032–8. 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.González-Rubio J, Navarro-López C, López-Nájera E, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of hospitalised current smokers and COVID-19. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:7394. 10.3390/ijerph17207394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Farsalinos K, Barbouni A, Niaura R. Systematic review of the prevalence of current smoking among hospitalized COVID-19 patients in China: could nicotine be a therapeutic option? Intern Emerg Med 2020;15:845–52. 10.1007/s11739-020-02355-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:377–81. 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bassett IV, Triant VA, Bunda BA, et al. Massachusetts general hospital Covid-19 registry reveals two distinct populations of hospitalized patients by race and ethnicity. PLoS One 2020;15:e0244270. 10.1371/journal.pone.0244270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.WHO Working Group on the Clinical Characterisation and Management of COVID-19 infection . A minimal common outcome measure set for COVID-19 clinical research. Lancet Infect Dis 2020;20:e192–7. 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30483-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Rice TW, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, et al. Comparison of the SpO2/FIO2 ratio and the PaO2/FIO2 ratio in patients with acute lung injury or ARDS. Chest 2007;132:410–7. 10.1378/chest.07-0617 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.StataCorp . Stata 16 base reference manual. College Station, TX: Stata Press, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Williams R. Using the margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects. Stata J 2012;12:308–31. 10.1177/1536867X1201200209 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Robinson LB, Fu X, Bassett IV, et al. COVID-19 severity in hospitalized patients with asthma: a matched cohort study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2021;9:497–500. 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.10.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wang Y, Chen J, Chen W, et al. Does asthma increase the mortality of patients with COVID-19?: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2021;182:76–82. 10.1159/000510953 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Reyes FM, Hache-Marliere M, Karamanis D, et al. Assessment of the association of COPD and asthma with in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19. A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis. J Clin Med 2021;10:2087. 10.3390/jcm10102087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lee SC, Son KJ, Han CH, et al. Impact of comorbid asthma on severity of coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Sci Rep 2020;10:21805. 10.1038/s41598-020-77791-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Liu S, Zhi Y, Ying S. COVID-19 and asthma: reflection during the pandemic. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2020;59:78–88. 10.1007/s12016-020-08797-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gonzales-van Horn SR, Farrar JD. Interferon at the crossroads of allergy and viral infections. J Leukoc Biol 2015;98:185–94. 10.1189/jlb.3RU0315-099R [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Carli G, Cecchi L, Stebbing J. Is asthma protective against COVID-19? Allergy 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Du H, Dong X, Zhang J-J, et al. Clinical characteristics of 182 pediatric COVID-19 patients with different severities and allergic status. Allergy 2021;76:510–32. 10.1111/all.14452 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wenzel SE. Asthma phenotypes: the evolution from clinical to molecular approaches. Nat Med 2012;18:716–25. 10.1038/nm.2678 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Dixon AE, Poynter ME. Mechanisms of asthma in obesity. pleiotropic aspects of obesity produce distinct asthma phenotypes. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2016;54:601–8. 10.1165/rcmb.2016-0017PS [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bates JHT, Poynter ME, Frodella CM, et al. Pathophysiology to phenotype in the asthma of obesity. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2017;14:S395–8. 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201702-122AW [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mohan A, Grace J, Wang BR, et al. The effects of obesity in asthma. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2019;19:49. 10.1007/s11882-019-0877-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Goyal P, Ringel JB, Rajan M, et al. Obesity and COVID-19 in New York City: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2020;173:855–8. 10.7326/M20-2730 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Popkin BM, Du S, Green WD, et al. Individuals with obesity and COVID-19: a global perspective on the epidemiology and biological relationships. Obes Rev 2020;21:e13128. 10.1111/obr.13128 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Simonnet A, Chetboun M, Poissy J, et al. High prevalence of obesity in severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Obesity 2020;28:1195–9. 10.1002/oby.22831 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Simons D, Shahab L, Brown J, et al. The association of smoking status with SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalization and mortality from COVID-19: a living rapid evidence review with Bayesian meta-analyses (version 7). Addiction 2021;116:1319–68. 10.1111/add.15276 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Alqahtani JS, Oyelade T, Aldhahir AM, et al. Prevalence, severity and mortality associated with COPD and smoking in patients with COVID-19: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2020;15:e0233147. 10.1371/journal.pone.0233147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Patanavanich R, Glantz SA. Smoking is associated with worse outcomes of COVID-19 particularly among younger adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 2021;21:1554. 10.1186/s12889-021-11579-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Sanchez-Ramirez DC, Mackey D. Underlying respiratory diseases, specifically COPD, and smoking are associated with severe COVID-19 outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Respir Med 2020;171:106096. 10.1016/j.rmed.2020.106096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Taylor EH, Marson EJ, Elhadi M, et al. Factors associated with mortality in patients with COVID-19 admitted to intensive care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia 2021;76:1224–32. 10.1111/anae.15532 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Alraddadi BM, Watson JT, Almarashi A, et al. Risk factors for primary middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus illness in humans, Saudi Arabia, 2014. Emerg Infect Dis 2016;22:49–55. 10.3201/eid2201.151340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Park J-E, Jung S, Kim A, et al. MERS transmission and risk factors: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 2018;18:574. 10.1186/s12889-018-5484-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Han L, Ran J, Mak Y-W, et al. Smoking and influenza-associated morbidity and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiology 2019;30:405–17. 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000984 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Shi T, Balsells E, Wastnedge E, et al. Risk factors for respiratory syncytial virus associated with acute lower respiratory infection in children under five years: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glob Health 2015;5:020416. 10.7189/jogh.05.020416 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Bello S, Menéndez R, Antoni T, et al. Tobacco smoking increases the risk for death from pneumococcal pneumonia. Chest 2014;146:1029–37. 10.1378/chest.13-2853 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Wenzl T. Smoking and COVID-19: a review of studies suggesting a protective effect of smoking against COVID-19. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 64.Mabley J, Gordon S, Pacher P. Nicotine exerts an anti-inflammatory effect in a murine model of acute lung injury. Inflammation 2011;34:231–7. 10.1007/s10753-010-9228-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ulloa L. The vagus nerve and the nicotinic anti-inflammatory pathway. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2005;4:673–84. 10.1038/nrd1797 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Ho T, Cusack RP, Chaudhary N, et al. Under- and over-diagnosis of COPD: a global perspective. Breathe 2019;15:24–35. 10.1183/20734735.0346-2018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Kavanagh J, Jackson DJ, Kent BD. Over- and under-diagnosis in asthma. Breathe 2019;15:e20–7. 10.1183/20734735.0362-2018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
bmjresp-2021-001038supp001.pdf (13.6KB, pdf)
Data Availability Statement
Data are available upon reasonable request. Data requests will be reviewed by the MGH COVID Registry.