Table 4.
Performance comparison of the proposed AL6mA and LA6mA methods with LA6mA-al and AL6mA-al with the removal of the attention layer on the test datasets
| Dataset | Method | Sen | Spe | Acc | MCC | AUROC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arabidopsis thaliana | LA6mA | 0.899 | 0.917 | 0.909 | 0.817 | 0.962 |
| LA6mA-al | 0.904 | 0.891 | 0.897 | 0.794 | 0.958 | |
| AL6mA | 0.862 | 0.905 | 0.884 | 0.768 | 0.945 | |
| AL6mA-al | 0.854 | 0.888 | 0.871 | 0.743 | 0.935 | |
| Drosophila melanogaster | LA6mA | 0.909 | 0.915 | 0.912 | 0.824 | 0.966 |
| LA6mA-al | 0.896 | 0.907 | 0.902 | 0.803 | 0.962 | |
| AL6mA | 0.840 | 0.916 | 0.878 | 0.758 | 0.941 | |
| AL6mA-al | 0.866 | 0.872 | 0.869 | 0.738 | 0.937 |