Skip to main content
Public Health Action logoLink to Public Health Action
. 2021 Nov 1;11(Suppl 1):64–69. doi: 10.5588/pha.21.0034

High drug resistance among Gram-negative bacteria in sputum samples from an intensive care unit in Nepal

R Ghimire 1,, H A Gupte 2, S Shrestha 3, P Thekkur 4,5, S Kharel 6, H P Kattel 7, P S Shrestha 8, N Poudel 9, S Shakya 9, S Parajuli 1, A Mudvari 1, J Edwards 10
PMCID: PMC8575379  PMID: 34778018

Abstract

SETTING:

Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.

OBJECTIVES:

1) To report the number and proportion of Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Burkholderia, Stenotrophomonas (PABS) species among intensive care unit (ICU) patients with sputum culture; and 2) to assess antimicrobial resistance patterns, demographic and clinical characteristics associated with resistance to at least one antibiotic and ICU discharge outcomes among those patients with PABS species admitted to hospital between 14 April 2018 and 13 April 2019.

DESIGN:

This was a hospital-based, cross-sectional study using secondary data.

RESULTS:

Of 166 who underwent sputum culture, 104 (63%) had bacterial growth, of which, 67 (64%) showed PABS species. Of the positive cultures, Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Burkholderia and Stenotrophomonas were present in respectively 32 (30.7%), 31 (29.8%), 1 (1%) and 3 (2.8%). Pseudomonas showed a high level of resistance to levofloxacin (61%), cefepime (50%) and amikacin (50%). Acinetobacter was largely resistant to cefepime (95%), imipenem (92%) and levofloxacin (86%). Of the 67 with PABS infection, 32 (48%) died.

CONCLUSION:

The study showed a high prevalence of Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter and the emergence of Stenotrophomonas in sputum culture samples of ICU patients. This highlights the need for monitoring PABS and associated resistance patterns to reduce mortality in ICU patients.

Keywords: SORT IT, AMR, Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Burkholderia, Stenotrophomonas


Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global public health problem that is impacting environmental, social and economic targets of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).1 Infections due to drug-resistant pathogens claim the lives of at least 700,000 people per year worldwide and this will likely rise to approximately 10 million by 2050.2 In response, the WHO has endorsed a Global Action Plan (GAP) on AMR for strengthening capacities of countries to tackle drug resistance.3

A risk assessment conducted by the WHO has demonstrated that AMR has been extremely challenging in the South-East Asian Region (SEAR).4 These challenges are particularly difficult for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where AMR is more prevalent, especially within tertiary intensive care settings. AMR now contributes to longer hospital stays, increased costs, morbidity and mortality.5 Multiple broad-spectrum antibiotics are routinely used empirically to manage life-threatening infections. The irrational use of antibiotics has contributed to the greater emergence of drug-resistant pathogens in developing countries.6 Nepal is not an exception, where there has been a rise in AMR in recent years.7,8

Critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) are highly vulnerable to infection, as they often undergo numerous, repetitive invasive procedures.9,10 The ICU is often recognised as the nidus for infectious diseases within a hospital setting.11 Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) are the most common bacterial infections that occur in 10–25% patients admitted to ICUs, resulting in high overall mortality that ranges from 22% to 71%.12,13 Nearly 15% of all Gram-negative bacilli isolated from clinical specimens, including sputum, are non-fermenting Gram-negative bacillus (NFGNB).14 Predisposing factors such as prolonged antimicrobial therapy, older age, advanced surgical and medical treatment, can lead to infections by NFGNB.15

NFGNB in tertiary care hospitals are frequently multidrug-resistant (MDR).16,17 Among the NFGNB bacteria, the most frequently observed pathogens reported have been the Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Burkholderia and Stenotrophomonas (PABS) species.16,18,19 Their prevalence and patterns of resistance in developing countries have not been well-documented. As reported in several studies previously, the burden of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) caused by PABS organisms is thought to be high in ICU settings of developing countries such as Nepal.16,18,20 In these studies, PABS isolation was more frequent in sputum specimens than other sources. To our knowledge, only a single study has been conducted on the prevalence and resistance pattern of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in ICU settings in Nepal,18 despite increasing reports of S. maltophilia outbreaks within ICUs in other countries.21

Therefore, we conducted this study to determine the burden of antimicrobial resistance of PABS species among patients admitted in the adult ICU and undergoing sputum culture at a tertiary care hospital in Kathmandu over a period of 1 year. Specific objectives were to determine the number and proportion of patients with growth of PABS species in sputum cultures, and to assess the pattern of antimicrobial resistance, the demographic and clinical characteristic associated with resistance to at least one antibiotic and ICU discharge outcomes among patients with PABS confirmed on sputum culture.

METHODS

Study design

This was a hospital-based, cross-sectional study of routinely collected hospital data.

Setting

The health system in Nepal (population: 30.2 million;22 7 provinces and 77 districts) is characterised by a wide network of health facilities and community workers and volunteers. Only 62% of the Nepalese households have access to health facilities within 30 min, with a significant urban (86%) and rural (59%) discrepancy.23 The healthcare delivery institutions in the country include private, public and mixed institutions.

Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital (TUTH), the first teaching hospital of Nepal (established in 1983), is a 700-bed public facility that accepts all patients regardless of payer source. Services provided include outpatient, general medical, surgical, maternal-child health, emergency, ICU and a broad array of supporting medical/surgical subspecialties.

The ICU at TUTH has 11 beds and is a mixed, medical-surgical unit with a high occupancy rate. General medical patients are the primary patients within the ICU setting, while neurosurgical patients are the most frequent surgical patients. There are approximately 800 patients admitted to the TUTH ICU every year.24 The ICU is staffed by full-time, in-house intensivists who provide full-spectrum intensive care, including invasive procedures and associated management. During the study period, the nurse-to-patient ratio was 2:1. There was a designated team for infection prevention and control within the ICU, which consisted of both a physician and nursing staff. Chlorhexi-dine-based hand sanitizers are at each bedside and staff are instructed to use these before/after each patient contact.

TUTH laboratory

The TUTH laboratory has a full-time microbiology department, which receives all samples from both outpatient and inpatient departments, including the ICU. The specimens are transported to the microbiology laboratory directly after they are collected by ICU staff. Sputum specimens are inoculated onto 5% sheep blood agar, MacConkey agar and chocolate agar (HiMedia, Mumbai, India) and incubated at 35°C for 24–48 h.

Study methods

Identification of isolated organism

All isolates were identified based on their morphological appearance, Gram’s stain characteristics, catalase test, coagulase test, oxidase test and biochemical parameters per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI; Wayne, PA, USA) guidelines.25 Only PABS bacterial isolates were included in the study; those isolates that had mixed bacterial species (PABS and others) were excluded.

Antibiotic susceptibility testing

Antibiotics discs with specified concentrations are used to determine the susceptibility pattern of isolated organism by using the disk diffusion method (modified Kirby-Bauer method) on Mueller Hinton agar (Hi-Media) and interpreted according to CLSI guidelines. Staphylococcus aureus American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) 25923, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were tested in every set of the experiment in parallel as part of quality control.

Antibiotic susceptibility

Antibiotic susceptibility was determined by the zone of inhibition consistent with the sensitivity chart provided by the manufacturer (HiMedia) and based on CLSI guidelines.25

Study population and period

The study included all patients admitted to the TUTH ICU whose sputum sample was sent for culture and drug susceptibility testing (CDST) from 14 April 2018 to 13 April 2019 and with isolated PABS species. Patients who were admitted for more than 2 calendar days in the health facility before collection of samples for CDST were considered to have a ‘hospital-acquired’ infection, while the rest considered were categorised as ‘community-acquired’.

Data variables, sources of data and data collection

Data variables included culture growth, presence of Gram-negative bacterial growth, presence of PABS and the antimicrobial resistance patterns of all the sputum samples sent for CDST from the ICU. Age, sex, number of antibiotics used and hospital exit outcomes of those patients with PABS sputum culture were also recorded. Sources of data were microbiology laboratory record files, medical records of ICU patients and the electronic database of ICU patients. A structured data collection proforma including all the study variables was used to extract data.

Data analysis and statistics

Data were entered using EpiData Entry software v3.1 (Epidata Association, Odense, Denmark). Data were then analysed using EpiData analysis software v2.2.2.186 (EpiData Association) and Stata v11.0 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA). Numbers and percentages were used to summarise the results of sputum CDST, demographic and clinical characteristics and hospital exit outcomes of adult ICU patients with PABS detected on sputum culture. Fisher’s exact test and χ2 test were used to assess the association between demographic and clinical characteristics with resistance to at least one antibiotic. Levels of significance was set at 5% (P < 0.05).

Ethics approval

Ethics approval was obtained from Institutional Review Committee (IRC) of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) of TUTH, Kathmandu, Nepal, and the Union Ethics Advisory Group of the Centre for Operational Research at the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France (EAG 06/20). The ethics committee waived the need for informed consent because data were collected from hospital records. The database did not include personal identifiers.

RESULTS

Of the 166 sputum culture samples from patients admitted to the ICU during study reference period, 63% (104/166) were positive for bacterial growth (Figure 1). Of those sputum cultures with bacterial growth, 64% (67/104) were positive for PABS. Among all the positive cultures, 31% (32/104) were due to Pseudomonas and 30% (31/104) due to Acinetobacter, while only 3% (3/104) were caused by Stenotrophomonas.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

The number and proportion with bacterial growth, Gram-negative bacteria and PABS among adult patients admitted to the ICU and undergoing blood culture at a tertiary care hospital in Kathmandu from April 2018 to April 2019. *Each patient contributes multiple sputum samples. PABS = Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Burkholderia and Stenotrophomonas; CDST = culture and drug susceptibility testing.

The demographic and clinical characteristics of those patients with PABS-related LRTIs are shown in Table 1. Of the total, 97% of patients required ventilator support and central venous line management. The minimum ICU stay was 2 days, with a maximum of 43 days. The proportion of infections acquired in the hospital was higher than that from the community (58% and 42%, respectively). In addition, because of the lack of consistent documentation, it was not possible to accurately determine the number of antibiotics patients had been on prior to obtaining sputum samples.

TABLE 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics associated with resistance to at least one antibiotic against PABS among adult patients admitted to the ICU and detected with PABS on sputum culture at a tertiary care hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal, 14 April 2018–15 April 2019

Characteristics Total Resistance to at least one antibiotic P value


N (%)* n (%)
Total
 Age, years (n = 63) 67 (100.0) 59 (88.1)
  18–29 9 (14.3) 8 (88.9) 0.812§
  30–44 12 (19.0) 11 (91.7)
  45–59 22 (34.9) 18 (81.8)
  ⩾60 20 (31.7) 18 (90.0)
 Sex
  Male 47 (70.1) 41 (87.2)
  Female 20 (29.9) 18 (90.0) 0.749§
 Reason for admission
  Medical 42 (62.7) 37 (88.1)
  Surgical 25 (37.3) 22 (88.0) 0.991§
 Origin of infection
  Hospital-acquired 39 (58.2) 35 (89.7)
  Community-acquired 28 (41.8) 24 (85.7) 0.616§
 Ventilator support#
  Yes 59 (96.7) 51 (86.4)
  No 2 (3.3) 2 (100.0) 1.000**
 Central line cannulation#
  Yes 59 (96.7) 51 (86.4)
  No 2 (3.3) 2 (100.0) 1.000**
 Number of antibiotics used#
  Uncertain 57 (85.1 51 (89.5)
  1 2 (3.0) 2 (100.0) 0.574§
  2 5 (7.5) 4 (80.0)
  ⩾3 3 (4.5) 2 (66.7)

* Column percentage.

Row percentage.

Information on age was available for only 63 patients.

§ χ2 test.

Those who were admitted for more than 2 calendar days in health facility before collection of samples for culture and drug susceptibility test were considered as ‘Hospital origin’ and the rest considered as ‘Community origin’.

# Prior to collection of sputum for CDST.

** Fisher’s Exact test.

PABS = Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Burkholderia and Stenotrophomonas; ICU = intensive care unit; CDST = culture and drug susceptibility testing.

The frequency of antibiotic resistance to high-use antibiotics for Pseudomonas was found to be as follows: levofloxacin, 61%, amikacin, 50% and cefepime, 50% (Table 2). For patients with Acinetobacter, antibiotic resistance was found to be as follows: cefepime, 95%, imipenem, 92% and levofloxacin, 86%. Of those with Stenotrophomonas, 50% were resistant to cefoperazone sulbactam, and 33% to both levofloxacin and tigecycline. There was only one sputum culture-positive sample for Burkholderia for which CDST results was not recorded.

TABLE 2.

The drug resistance pattern of PABS among adult patients admitted to the ICU and undergoing sputum culture at a tertiary care hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal, 14 April 2018–15 April 2019*

Drugs Pseudomonas Acinetobacter Stenotrophomonas


Test n (%) Test n (%) Test n (%)
Total
32 31 3
Amikacin 28 14 (50.0) 29 22 (75.9) 3 3 (100)
Ampicillin-sulbactam 17 8 (47.1) 2 2 (100.0)
Cefoperazone sulbactam 16 5 (31.2) 19 15 (78.9) 2 1 (50.0)
Cefepime 12 6 (50.0) 19 18 (94.7) 2 0 (0.0)
Ceftazidime 24 13 (52.2) 26 22 (84.6) 2 0 (0.0)
Colistin sulphate 23 4 (17.4) 29 3 (10.3) 2 0 (0.0)
Ciprofloxacin 28 16 (57.1) 28 23 (82.1) 2 0 (0.0)
Cotrimoxazole 16 16 (100.0) 22 20 (90.9) 3 0 (0.0)
Gentamycin 26 11 (42.3) 27 24 (88.9) 2 2 (100)
Imipenem 23 11 (47.8) 24 22 (91.7) 2 2 (100)
Levofloxacin 28 17 (60.7) 28 24 (85.7) 3 1 (33.3)
Meropenem 21 10 (47.6) 26 22 (84.6) 2 2 (100)
Piperacillin tazobactam 24 9 (37.5) 22 17 (77) 3 3 (100.0)
Polymyxin B 26 2 (7.7) 30 2 (6.7) 3 0 (0.0)
Tigecycline 15 10 (66.7) 3 1 (33.3)

*As there was only one case of Burkholderia in our study, CDST results for this case was not recorded and it has not been included in this table, although this has been discussed in the Results section.

Column percentage.

PABS = Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Burkholderia and Stenotrophomonas; ICU = intensive care unit; CDST = culture and drug susceptibility testing.

The mortality rate in patients with PABS-related LRTI was 48% (32/67) (Figure 2). However, clinical outcomes were not available for 25% of patients, and 6% of patient left against medical advice.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

ICU discharge outcomes of the adult patients admitted to the ICU and detected with PABS using sputum culture at a tertiary care hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal, 14 April 2018–15 April 2019. LAMA = leave against medical advice.

DISCUSSION

NFGNB-related infections have been emerging in recent years despite increasing awareness and infection prevention control measures among hospitalised patients.26,27 Identification of these organisms and the underlying antimicrobial resistance could play a key role in rationalising the use of antimicrobial agents, especially within ICU contexts, where broad-spectrum antibiotic use is frequent.

This study reports the magnitude and pattern of antimicrobial resistance of PABS species in sputum samples of patients admitted to the adult ICU of a tertiary care hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal. The key findings were 1) the proportion of sputum cultures with bacterial growth with PABS species was 64%, 2) Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter were the most commonly isolated PABS species, 3) resistance to at least one antibiotic among Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter was seen in respectively 81% and 97% of tested samples, and 4) almost half (48%) of the patients with PABS infection died during hospitalisation.

NFGNB have been of less concern, but have emerged as important nosocomial pathogens in recent years.16 Our study shows a high prevalence of Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter, which is consistent with previous studies by Chawla et al. (57% and 39%, respectively)28 in India and Yadav et al. (46% and 47%, respectively)18 in Nepal.

The study from India also reported isolation of Burkholderia (4 samples) and Stenotrophomonas (15 samples) among 5,056 samples with bacterial growth, which was lower than the current study (1% and 3%, respectively).19 Burkholderia was isolated from 5% of the samples in the previous study from Nepal.18

A study conducted by Erbay et al. in Turkey showed a lower prevalence of Pseudomonas (23%) and Acinetobacter (12%) among the patients admitted in ICU,29 and mechanical ventilation was found to be a strong risk factor. We found that 97% of patients with PABS-positive cultures were on ventilator support. These results are consistent with the well-known fact that mechanical ventilation is a key risk factor for PABS infection.18,30 Another study conducted in the same hospital in 2015 by Parajuli et al. reported a lower prevalence of Pseudomonas (12%), but higher prevalence of Acinetobacter (38%) among patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia.16

We found a mortality rate of 48% among patients with PABS-associated LRTI. This rate was likely to be higher, as it was difficult to be more accurate due to incomplete outcomes data. Our findings are consistent with previously reported ventilator-associated pneumonia mortality rates secondary to Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter infection, which ranged from 27% to 76%.31

NFGNB are known to produce extended spectrum β-lactamase and metallo-β-lactamase, which are innately resistant to many antibiotics.32 In our study, we have reported high resistance to many commonly used antibiotics. Acinetobacter isolates were found to be highly resistant to cefepime (94.7%), imipenem (91.7%), levofloxacin (86%), gentamicin (89%) and amikacin (76%), which was similar to the findings by Parajuli et al.16 Moreover, there is emerging resistance to imipenem by Acinetobacter as shown by the SENTRY Study conducted in 2011 by Gales et al.33 The increased prevalence of this organism could be due to high chance of acquisition of a resistance gene and their ability to persist and multiply in hospital environments. Key to limiting further emergence and spread will require the maintenance of high pharmacovigilance and infection control practices.34 In our study, we observed that Pseudomonas isolates were also found to be highly resistant to amikacin (50%), levofloxacin (61%) and ceftazidime (52%), which was similar to a previous study from India.35

Stenotrophomonas species were isolated from only three samples in our study. Of those patients with Stenotrophomonas-related infections, there was one mortality. Although not specifically examined in our study, these findings suggest that Stenotrophomonas may be evolving into an extensively drug-resistant (XDR) or pan drug-resistant (PDR) pathogen within the ICU at TUTH. This could potentially lead to increased rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia that would be refractory to almost all available therapeutics with high mortality risk. Further study in other similar settings need to be conducted to better understand these findings and provide ongoing surveillance for increasing emergence within Nepal.

The strengths of this study include the following: 1) all sputum samples were from an academic, tertiary ICU submitted for culture during a 12-month period, 2) STROBE guidelines were used to ensure the completeness and quality of reporting.36

Study limitations included the relatively small sample size. Patient-specific data from medical records such as previous hospitalisation, underlying comorbidities, previous antimicrobial therapy, number of sputum samples during ICU stay and reason for admission were frequently incomplete, limiting further exploration of possible associated risk factors. As antibiotic susceptibility selection was based on CLSI guidelines, all antibiotics were not tested for susceptibility across all samples. Finally, the data analysis did not allow us to determine the proportion of isolates that were MDR or XDR. These crucial aspects merit further research.

We found that Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter were the most common NFGNB isolated in patients admitted to the TUTH ICU. In addition, although the prevalence of Stenotrophomonas infection currently appears low, the degree of AMR is alarming. Knowledge of resistance patterns to commonly used therapeutic regimens for these organisms can help guide clinical practice for choosing empirical treatment against PABS in the critically ill. This will hopefully help reduce the development of further AMR within the ICU setting. The results of our study need to be validated by others, and broader surveillance measures should be implemented in Nepal and the surrounding SEAR in order to monitor and avert additional emergence of drug resistance. Local, regional and national attention to this growing challenge is needed to mitigate further AMR, failing which patient outcomes will likely worsen with far reaching social and economic impact.

In conclusion, Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter were the most common NFGNB organisms isolated from sputum specimens among the patients admitted to the ICU of a tertiary hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal. Stenotrophomonas isolates that have been reported from other parts of the world were also demonstrated to be present in this ICU and showed high-level of resistance to commonly used broad-spectrum antibiotics. Our findings add to the growing evidence of emerging antibiotic resistance within critical care settings in SEAR, and highlight the need for increased support for surveillance, antibiotic stewardship and education.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was conducted through the Structured Operational Research and Training Initiative (SORT IT), a global partnership coordinated by Tropical Disease Research (TDR), the Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases at the WHO. The specific SORT IT programme that led to these publications included a partnership of TDR with the WHO Country Office of Nepal and was implemented along with the Tuberculosis Research and Prevention Centre Non-Governmental Organisation, Yerevan, Armenia; the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Paris, France, and South East Asia, New Delhi, India offices; the Damien Foundation, Brussels, Belgium; the Narotam Sekhsaria Foundation, Mumbai, India; Sustainable Health Systems, Freetown, Sierra Leone; the Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone; School of Public Health and Community Medicine, B P Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal; the Institute of Medical Research, Bangalore, India; University of Exeter, Exeter, UK; and the University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

The authors would like to thank M Adhikari and S K Mishra for providing necessary laboratory information; and the study participants and all the staff of the Intensive Care Unit and Microbiology Department of the hospital for their help in conducting this study.

Footnotes

This SORT IT AMR Programme was funded by National Institute of Health Research, Department of Health & Social Care of the United Kingdom and supported by implementing partners. Conflicts of interest: none declared.

Open access statement and disclaimer: In accordance with WHO’s open-access publication policy for all work funded by WHO or authored/co-authored by WHO staff members, WHO retains the copyright of this publication through a Creative Commons Attribution IGO license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/legalcode) which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited.

There should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of their affiliated institutions. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article’s original url.

Data management statement: The dataset used in this paper has been deposited at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14447289.v1 and is available under a CC BY 4.0 license.

References

  • 1.Jasovský D, Littmann J, Zorzet A, Cars O. Antimicrobial resistance—a threat to the world’s sustainable development. Uppsala J Med Sci. 2016 Jul 2;121(3):159–64. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2016.1195900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bryan-Wilson J. No time to wait. Artforum Int. 2016;54(10):113–114. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.World Health Organization Global action plan on antimicrobial resistance. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2017. https://www.who.int/antimicrobial-resistance/publications/global-action-plan/en/#.YFYL3lb56hk.mendeley Accessed March 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chereau F, et al. Risk assessment for antibiotic resistance in South East Asia. BMJ. 2017;358:2–8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.World Health Organisation Antimicrobial resistance. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2020. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antimicrobial-resistance [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Byarugaba DK. A view on antimicrobial resistance in developing countries and responsible risk factors. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004;24(2):105–110. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2004.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Basnyat B, et al. Antibiotic use, its resistance in Nepal and recommendations for action: a situation analysis. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2015;13:102–111. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dahal RH, Chaudhary DK. Microbial infections and antimicrobial resistance in Nepal: current trends and recommendations. Open Microbiol J. 2018;12:230–242. doi: 10.2174/1874285801812010230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Timsit J-F, Laupland KB. Update on bloodstream infections in ICUs. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2012;18(5):479–486. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e328356cefe. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Al-Zahrani AK, et al. Healthcare associated infection in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of King Abdl Aziz Specialist Hospital, Taif, KSA. Adv Infect Dis. 2013;03(04):300–305. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Brusselaers N, Vogelaers D, Blot S. The rising problem of antimicrobial resistance in the intensive care unit. Ann Intensive Care. 2011;1(1):47. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-1-47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kumari HBV, Nagarathna S, Chandramuki A. Antimicrobial resistance pattern among aerobic gram-negative bacilli of lower respiratory tract specimens of intensive care unit patients in a neurocentre. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. 2007;49(1):19–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Goel N, et al. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of gram negative bacilli isolated from the lower respiratory tract of ventilated patients in the Intensive care unit. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2009;13(3):148–151. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.58540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rubin SJ, Granato PA, Wasilauskas BL. Glucose nonfermenting Gram-negative bacteria. In: Lennette EH, Balows A, Hausler WJ Jr, Shadomy HJE, editors. Manual of clinical microbiology. 4th ed. Washington, DC, USA: American Society for Microbiology; 1985. pp. 330–349. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Baron EJ, Peterson LR, Finegold SM. 9th ed. St. Louis, MO, USA: Mosby-Year Book; 1994. Nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli and coccobacilli. Bailey & Scott’s diagnostic microbiology; pp. 386–405. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Parajuli NP, et al. High burden of antimicrobial resistance among gram negative bacteria causing healthcare associated infections in a critical care unit of Nepal. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017;6(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s13756-017-0222-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kaur A, Gill AK, Singh S. Prevalence and antibiogram of nonfermenting gram negative bacilli isolates obtained from various clinical samples in a tertiary care hospital, Bathinda, Punjab, India. Int J Res Med Sci. 2018;6(4):1228. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yadav SK, et al. Emergence of multidrug-resistant non-fermentative gram negative bacterial infection in hospitalized patients in a tertiary care center of Nepal. BMC Res Notes. 2020;13(1):4–9. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05163-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chawla K, Vishwanath S, Munim FC. Nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli other than pseudomonas aeruginosa and acinetobacter spp. causing respiratory tract infections in a tertiary care center. J Glob Infect Dis. 2013;5(4):144–148. doi: 10.4103/0974-777X.121996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mishra S, et al. Recent trend of bacterial aetiology of lower respiratory tract infection in a tertiary care centre of Nepal. Int J Infect Microbiol. 2012;1(1):3–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Looney WJ. Role of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in hospital-acquired infection. Br J Biomed Sci. 2005;62(3):145–154. doi: 10.1080/09674845.2005.11732702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.National Planning Commission Central Bureau of Statistics National population and housing census, 2021. Kathmandu, Nepal: NPCCB; 2021. https://censusnepal.cbs.gov.np/Home/Index/EN [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mishra SR, et al. National health insurance policy in Nepal: challenges for implementation. Glob Health Action. 2015;8(1):8–10. doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.28763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Acharya SP, Bhattarai A, Bhattarai B. An audit of an intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital. J Nepal Med Assoc. 2018;56(212):759–762. doi: 10.31729/jnma.3703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute Peformance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility. Accepted standards. 12th ed. Vol. 35. Wayne, PA, USA: CLSI; 2015. CLSI M02-A12. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sharma D, et al. Non fermentative gram negative bacilli as nosocomial pathogens: Identification and antibiotic sensitivity in clinical samples of indoor patients. Nepal J Med Sci. 2015;3(2):101–105. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Malini A, et al. Nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli infections in a tertiary care hospital in Kolar, Karnataka. J Lab Physicians. 2009;1(02):062–6. doi: 10.4103/0974-2727.59701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chawla K, Vishwanath S, Munim FC. Nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli other than Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. causing respiratory tract infections in a tertiary care center. J Glob Infect Dis. 2013;5(4):144–148. doi: 10.4103/0974-777X.121996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Erbay H, et al. Nosocomial infections in intensive care unit in a Turkish university hospital: a 2-year survey. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29(9):1482–1488. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1788-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shakya R, Shrestha RR, Manandhar S. Ventilator associated pneumonia in intensive care units of a tertiary care hospital in Nepal. Post-Grad Med J NAMS. 2020;20(1):25–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sadigov A, Mamedova I, Mammmadov K. Ventilator-associated pneumonia and in-hospital mortality: which risk factors may predict in-hospital mortality in such patients? J Lung Health Dis. 2019;3(4):8–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Livermore DM. Current epidemiology and growing resistance of Gram-negative pathogens. Korean J Intern Med. 2012;27(2):128–142. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2012.27.2.128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gales AC, Jones RN, Sader HS. Contemporary activity of colistin and polymyxin B against a worldwide collection of Gram-negative pathogens: results from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2006–09) J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66(9):2070–2074. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.World Health Organization Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2001. Global strategy for containment of antimicrobial resistance; p. 105. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Juyal D, et al. Prevalence of non-fermenting gram negative bacilli and their in vitro susceptibility pattern in a tertiary care hospital of Uttarakhand: a study from foothills of Himalayas. Saudi J Heal Sci. 2013;2(2):108. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gharaibeh A, Koppikar S, Bonilla-Escobar F. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) in the International Journal of Medical Students. Int J Med Students. 2014;2(2):36–37. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Public Health Action are provided here courtesy of The International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease

RESOURCES