Table 4.
Patient outcomes
| Author Year | Intraoperative blood loss (mL) robot group | Intraoperative blood loss (mL) conventional group | P value | Fracture-healing time robot group (mo) | Fracture-healing result conventional group (mo) | P value | Functional outcomes | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tao Long 2019 | 33.89 ± 16.4 (15–80) | 43.04 ± 12.34 (30–80) | <.001 | 4.61 ± 0.68 (3.5–6.3) | 4.56 ± 0.78 (3.4–6.2) | .53 | Majeed functionRobot group 49 excellent, 2 good, 5 fair, 0 poorConventional group 30 excellent, 2 good, 3 fair, 0 poor | NS |
| Hua-shui Liu 2019 | 35.2 ± 3.6 (5–50) | N/A | N/A | 3 mo | N/A | N/A | Majeed functionRobot group: 57 cases excellent, 26 good, 3 fair | N/A |
| Jun-Qiang Wang 2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Hua-shui Liu 2018 | 35.0 ± 7.2 | 46.2 ± 9.3 | <.001 | 4.3 ± 0.7 | 4.5 ± 1.1 | .45 | Majeed function (score)Robot group: 86.4 ± 7.2Conventional group: 84.3 ± 10.3 | .43 |
| Hai Lan 2019 | 90.80 ± 14.98 | 118 ± 32.21 | <.001 | Fracture healing rate100% at follow-up | Fracture healing rate100% at follow-up | NS | Harris hip scoreRobot group: 86.68 ± 6.23Conventional group: 82.69 ± 6.85 | .034 |
| Sheng-jun Duan 2019 | 9.5 ± 6.8 | 41.3 ± 12.4 | <.001 | 4.6 ± 1.9 | 5.3 ± 2.1 | .223 | Harris hip scoreRobot group: 88.3 ± 4.4Conventional group: 87.6 ± 3.9 | .559 |
| Meng He 2019 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Harris hip scoreRobot group: 85.20Conventional group: 83.45 | NS |
| Bo Liu 2019 | N/A | N/A | N/A | mean 8 wks (range 7–10) | N/A | Mayo wrist score robot group: 96 (85–100) | N/A |