Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 1;2021:2621655. doi: 10.1155/2021/2621655

Table 1.

Summarized results of contemporary state-of-the-art techniques.

Year Data description Approaches Accuracy (%)
Reference [19], 2015 Parkinson's disease dataset SVM 99.49
ANN 96.77
KNN 96.07
Decision Tree 95
Random Forest 90.26
Naive Bayes 74.31
Reference [8], 2015 Dengue dataset Naive Bayes 100
Reference [9], 2015 Cleveland database of UCI repository Decision Tree (J48) 56.76
Reference [20], 2014 Parkinson's disease dataset SVM 85.48
Reference [22], 2013 Lung cancer dataset Decision Tree 90.59
Heart dataset Naive Bayes 80.75
Dermatology Naive Bayes 82.32
Reference [17], 2013 Cancer Decision Tree 97.77
Blood bank sector J48 89.9
Diabetes mellitus C4.5 82.6
HIV/AIDS C4.5 81.8
Tuberculosis KNN 78
Hepatitis C Decision Rule 73.20
Heart disease Naive Bayes 60
Reference [10], 2013 Heart disease Naive Bayes 74
Reference [18], 2013 Heart disease dataset (Cleveland Clinic Foundation) CART 83.49
Reference [7], 2013 Cleveland Heart Disease database Naive Bayes 95
Reference [6], 2012 Lung cancer (SEER dataset) Decision Tree (C4.5) 94.43
Reference [21], 2010 Heart disease dataset Naive Bayes 52.33