Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 25;9(10):e24872. doi: 10.2196/24872

Table 7.

Performance of the prediction of depression screening status in contrasted subsamples.

Contrasted subsample and model (feature set) No information rate Accuracy Sensitivity Specificity PPVa NPVb κ AUCc
PHQ-9d score of ≥10 at assessment 1 or 2 (n=78)

Ae 0.51 0.80 0.82 0.78 0.78 0.82 0.59 0.75

Bf 0.51 0.77 0.79 0.75 0.75 0.79 0.54 0.74

Cg 0.51 0.71 0.74 0.68 0.68 0.73 0.41 0.70
PHQ-9 score of ≥8 at assessment 1 or 2 (n=44)

A 0.50 0.71 0.73 0.68 0.70 0.71 0.41 0.71

B 0.50 0.71 0.77 0.64 0.68 0.74 0.41 0.68

C 0.50 0.71 0.73 0.68 0.70 0.71 0.41 0.64
PHQ-9 average score of ≥8 (n=84)

A 0.50 0.77 0.79 0.76 0.77 0.78 0.55 0.76

B 0.50 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.43 0.71

C 0.50 0.61 0.64 0.57 0.60 0.62 0.21 0.57
Top 20% and bottom 20% by average PHQ-9 score (n=96)

A 0.50 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.54 0.80

B 0.50 0.74 0.73 0.75 0.75 0.74 0.48 0.76

C 0.50 0.65 0.63 0.67 0.65 0.64 0.29 0.62

aPPV: positive predictive value.

bNPV: negative predictive value.

cAUC: area under the curve.

dPHQ-9: 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire.

eModel A includes digital biomarkers selected at a significance level of <.01.

fModel B includes digital biomarkers selected at a significance level of <.05.

gModel C includes digital biomarkers selected at a significance level of <.05 and ≥.01.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure