Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 8;22(Suppl 2):932. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04679-7

Table 2.

Differences in scores over time and between the two groups

LA (patients = 72) mean ± SD PA (patients = 68) mean ± SD p-value
preop ADL 5.2 ± 1.2 5.0 ± 1.3 ns
ADL at follow-up 5.2 ± 1.3 5.5 ± 1.1 ns
p-value ns < 0.001
preop IADL 6.0 ± 1.9 5.6 ± 2.1 ns
IADL at follow-up 6.8 ± 1.9 6.8 ± 2.0 ns
p-value < 0.001 < 0.001
preop WOMAC 70.7 ± 13.6 76.1 ± 14.9 ns
WOMAC at follow-up 20.9 ± 20.7 14.5 ± 17.5 0.018
p-value < 0.001 < 0.001
preop VAS 8.7 ± 1.5 9.2 ± 1.2 ns
VAS at follow-up 2.5 ± 2.5 1.3 ± 1.9 0.002
p-value < 0.001 < 0.001
preop HHS 33.9 ± 15.3 28.5 ± 14.8 0.036
HHS at follow-up 82.9 ± 20.3 86.0 ± 16.6 ns
p-value < 0.001 < 0.001

LA means lateral approach, PA posterior approach, SD standard deviation, ADL Activities of Daily Living, IADL Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, WOMAC Western Ontario and McMaster University, VAS Visual Analogue Scale, HHS Harris Hip Score, ns not significant