Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 8;40:352. doi: 10.1186/s13046-021-02110-6

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariable analyses of OS and DFS in HCC patients

Variable OS DFS
Univariate analysis Multivariable analysis Univariate analysis Multivariable analysis
P > |z| P > |z| HR(95%CI) P > |z| P > |z| HR(95%CI)
miR-378a-3p expression
 Low (n = 54) vs. high (n = 54) < 0.001 0.003 0.414(0.232-0.736) 0.001 0.010 0.454(0.249-0.828)
Gender
 Male (n = 75) vs. female (n = 33) 0.944 0.737
Age (years)
  ≤ 60 (n = 83) vs. > 60 (n = 25) 0.518 0.837
Grade of differentiation
 Low (n = 56) vs. middle-high (n = 52) 0.330 0.444
Tumor diameter (cm)
  ≤ 5 (n = 50) vs. > 5 (n = 58) 0.588 0.294
Liver function (Child-Pugh stage)
 A (n = 92) vs. B or C (n = 16) 0.901 0.980
Hepatocirrhosis
 Absent (n = 31) vs. present (n = 77) 0.874 0.698
Hepatitis B virus
 Absent (n = 43) vs. present (n = 65) 0.189 0.692
Tumor thrombus
 Absent (n = 65) vs. present (n = 43) 0.079 0.052
AFP (ng/ml)
  ≤ 20 (n = 53) vs. > 20 (n = 55) 0.264 0.973
BCLC stage
 I (n = 41) vs. II, III, or IV (n = 67) 0.194 0.149
Envelope
 Absent (n = 52) vs. present (n = 56) 0.142 0.946
Tumor satellite
 Absent (n = 63) vs. present (n = 45) 0.146 0.411
MVD
 High (n = 59) vs. Low (n = 49) < 0.001 0.018 2.048(1.129-3.715) 0.001 0.022 2.036(1.106-3.746)