Table 2.
Comparison results using the CASF benchmark datasets
Datasets | Methods | MAE | RMSE | PCC | SCC | SD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASF-2016 | BAPA | 1.021 | 1.308 | 0.819 | 0.819 | 1.247 |
OnionNet | 1.137 | 1.542 | 0.707 | 0.715 | 1.539 | |
Pafnucy | 1.327 | 1.647 | 0.685 | 0.681 | 1.584 | |
PLEC | 1.138 | 1.454 | 0.760 | 0.753 | 1.412 | |
RF-score | 1.121 | 1.395 | 0.812 | 0.805 | 1.269 | |
CASF-2013 | BAPA | 1.170 | 1.457 | 0.771 | 0.774 | 1.433 |
OnionNet | 1.423 | 1.890 | 0.555 | 0.605 | 1.872 | |
Pafnucy | 1.503 | 1.862 | 0.592 | 0.592 | 1.815 | |
PLEC | 1.246 | 1.615 | 0.716 | 0.724 | 1.571 | |
RF-score | 1.293 | 1.572 | 0.751 | 0.757 | 1.487 |