Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 20;6:186. Originally published 2021 Jul 22. [Version 2] doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16894.2

Table 5. Degrees of Freedom (df), log-Likelihood (logLik), AICc, ∆AIC (AICci – AICcmin) and AICc w (AICc weight) for each linear model ordered in descending fit (best-fitting model at the top) for glucose perturbations.

The response variable for each model is either proportion of ring stage parasites (Ring.prop), parasite density (Parasite) or RBC density (RBC).

Model description: df logLik AICc ∆AIC AICc w
A) Glucose.conc ~ + (1|mouseID)
hour * treatment 26 -184.802 435.6 0.00 1
treatment 5 -225.597 461.7 26.05 0
null 3 -230.388 467.0 31.33 0
hour + treatment 12 -221.788 470.3 34.67 0
hour 10 -226.544 475.0 39.34 0
B) Ring prop ~
hour 9 115.438 -211.4 0.00 0.911
hour + treatment 11 115.456 -206.6 4.72 0.086
hour * treatment 25 131.257 -199.8 11.58 0.003
null 2 33.888 -63.7 147.67 0.000
treatment 4 33.893 -59.5 151.89 0.000
C) Parasite ~ + (1|hour) + (1|mouseID)
null 4 -7.358 23.0 0.00 0.98
treatment 6 -9.053 30.8 7.76 0.02
D) RBC ~ + (1|hour) + (1|mouseID)
null 4 224.77 -441.2 0.00 0.999
treatment 6 219.69 -426.7 14.54 0.001