Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 May 26.
Published in final edited form as: Crit Rev Toxicol. 2021 May 26;51(3):264–282. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2021.1907530

Table 2.

Current methodologies to measure miRNA

Method Strengths Limitations Applications Metric Dynamic range Sensitivitya
SYBR-based qPCR Sensitivity

Broad target compatibility

Detection reproducibility

Common standard operating procedure

Cheaper than probe-based technologies
Multi-step workflows

Commonly requires purified RNA

Input required for many miRNA screenings can be too high for scarce samples

Non-specific amplification difficult to measure

IsomiR sequences difficult to discriminate
Discovery development, Validation, Safety assessment/Preclinical studies, Clinical Cycle threshold (Ct) 7 logs ++++
Hydrolysis probe-based (“TaqMan”) qPCR Sensitivity

Broad target compatibility

Detection reproducibility

Specificity vs. SYBR qPCR

Common standard operating procedure
Multi-step workflows

Commonly requires purified RNA

Input required for many miRNA screenings can be too high for scarce samples

Non-specific amplification difficult to measure

IsomiR sequences difficult to discriminate
Discovery and development, Validation, Safety assessment/Preclinical studies, Clinical Cycle threshold (Ct) 7 logs ++++
Digital PCR Digital quantification without standard curve

Sensitivity due to end-point amplification
Multi-step workflows

Commonly requires purified RNA

Non-specific amplification difficult to measure

IsomiR sequences difficult to discriminate
Discovery and development, Validation, Safety assessment/Preclinical studies, Clinical Copy number 5 logs ++++
Bead hybridization Can be compatible with biofluids and tissues without RNA purification

Low input with amplification
Number of miRNA detected

Sensitivity without amplification is poor

IsomiR sequences difficult to discriminate
Discovery, Validation, Safety assessment/Preclinical studies, Clinical Abundance (with curve) 5 logs ++++
Next generation sequencing Breadth of small RNA species detected

Single nucleotide specificity

Can distinguish isomiRs
Laborious multi-step workflow

Input for workflows too high for scarce samples
Discovery and development Reads per unit 5–6 logs ++
Digital counting Lack of amplification bias

Digital quantification without standard curve
Input requirements higher than qPCR

Generally lower specificity within miRNA families

IsomiR sequences difficult to discriminate
Discovery and development, Validation, Safety assessment/Preclinical studies, Clinical Counts 5–6 logs ++
Microarray Breadth of miRNA detected Workflows are labor intensive

Input for workflows is high, requires purified RNA

Generally lower specificity within miRNA families

IsomiR sequences difficult to discriminate
Discovery and development Relative fluorescence 3–4 logs +

Abbreviations: miRNA, microRNA; qPCR, quantitative PCR.

Sources: Jensen et al. (2011), Sah et al. (2010), Tan et al. (2015), and Godoy et al. (2019).

a

++++ = <100 copies, +++ = 100–1000 copies, ++ = 1000–5000 copies, and + = ≥5001 copies.