Table 2.
Themes, subthemes, and representative quotes describing what participants felt could be improved about Bella.
Themes and subthemes | Representative quotes | |
Interaction behaviors |
|
|
|
More human-like movements | The movement of Bella is still quite robotic and her eyes cannot really focus, which makes her sometimes not seem very engaged in the interaction. [Participant ID 125] |
|
Ability to touch | A sad thing is you can’t touch her. Make a doll out of her. A nice cuddly soft doll. [Participant ID 115] |
|
More positive emotional expression | Smiles. [Participant ID 118] |
Conversation design |
|
|
|
Extra conversation topics | A wider range of subjects. [Participant ID 101] |
|
Greater interactivity | More interaction by talking to her, rather than just a yes or no. [Participant ID 107] |
|
More personalized responses | Answers need to be more individualized (e.g., welcoming the participant by name and building on each day’s responses). [Participant ID 112] |
|
Regularly update information | Information wasn’t as up to date (eg, COVID levels). [Participant ID 129] |
|
Avoid human-like backstories | I didn’t like the comments she made such as ‘I contacted my friend today.’ I found it weird that she was pretending to be real. I would have preferred if it was just accepted as an interface that had a good selection of resources that you could navigate in an interesting dynamic way. [Participant ID 126] |
|
Address user by name | By addressing each person by their name, that way we could feel in the moment. [Participant ID 116] |
|
Incorporate user’s life experience | Most older people (I am 82) have many years of life experience and perhaps some way could be found to take life experience into consideration. [Participant ID 112] |
Robotic speech |
|
|
|
A more human-like voice | Perhaps maybe not sound so robotic? It might be hard to achieve but all the inflections and warmth that someone would have in their tone and delivery was missing and I think that’s what would have made Bella more engaging for me. [Participant ID 127] |
|
Formal speech delivery | Improve pronunciation. Use correct English (nope and yeah are not acceptable). [Participant ID 105] |
Technology advances |
|
|
|
Natural language understanding | I think given advances in technology this will happen anyway. Found the response from her using the audio didn’t always work so found it easier to type the responses to her. [Participant ID 102] |
|
General technology advances | I guess technology will advance and make changes but pretty amazing now. [Participant ID 111] |
Preference for a real human | Personally, I believe talking to a real person is far more desirable. [Participant ID 106] | |
No changes | I accept it for what she is. Saying that we are not all the same, she is different, she is what she is. [Participant ID 104] |