Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 9;16(11):e0259321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259321

Table 3. Study characteristics of studies that used objective and subjective olfactory measures.

First Author, Year Country Sample Size Age (years) (mean/median* (SD) COVID-19 Disease Severity Olfactory Assessment Tool Initial Smell Function
Anosmia Hyposmia Normosmia
% % %
Cohort Studies
Bertlich, 2021 [57] Europe (Germany) 23 59.0 (16.6) Mild-Moderate BSIT 72.70% 27.3% 0%
SNOT-22
VAS
Lechien, 2021 [58] Europe 233(Objective). 1363(Subjective). 44.5 (16.4) Mild-Moderate Sniffin’ Sticks 32.20% 18.40% 49.40%
SNOT-22
Iannuzzi, 2020 [59] EU (Italy) 34 47.47 (13) Mild-Moderate Sniffin’ Sticks, VAS 10% 53.30% 36.70%
HRS
Lechien, 2020 [60] EU (Belgium) 88 42.6 (11.2) Mild-Moderate Sniffin’ Sticks SNOT-22, 40% 35% 25%
sQOD-NS, NHANES (smell/taste components), tests

SD = Standard Deviation; RT-PCR = Reverse Transcription–Polymerase Chain Reaction; BSIT = The Brief Smell Identification Test; VAS = Visual Analogue Score; SNOT-22 = Sino-nasal Outcome Test-22; HRS = Hyposmia Rating Scale; sQOD-NS = short version of the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders-Negative Statements; NHANES = National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.