Table 2.
Estimation method: OLS | (1) |
(2) |
(3) |
(4) |
(5) |
(6) |
(7) |
(8) |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Older respondents (65–74 years) |
Young respondents (25–34 years) |
||||||||
Number of observations: |
798 |
797 |
|||||||
Dependent variable (5-point scale): | voluntary | forced | distressed | should be improved | voluntary | forced | distressed | should be improved | |
Treatment A | Comparison | −0.02 | −0.09 | 0.04 | 0.06 | −0.11 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.08 |
(0.10) | (0.09) | (0.10) | (0.11) | (0.15) | (0.11) | (0.11) | (0.11) | ||
Treatment B | Influence-gain | 0.10 | −0.06 | 0.07 | 0.05 | −0.20 | −0.01 | 0.10 | 0.14 |
(0.13) | (0.16) | (0.10) | (0.12) | (0.14) | (0.09) | (0.09) | (0.09) | ||
Treatment C | Influence-loss | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.17** | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.42*** | 0.18 | 0.37*** |
(0.11) | (0.13) | (0.07) | (0.10) | (0.13) | (0.10) | (0.11) | (0.10) | ||
Attribute variables | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
Note: Cluster robust standard errors at prefecture level in parentheses; ***p < .01, **p < .05, *p < .1.