Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 30;3(6):100381. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100381

Table 3.

Diagnostic performance of CAP for grading steatosis and diagnosing NASH (n = 112).

AUROC (95% CI∗) Cut-off (dB/m) Se (95% CI) Sp (95% CI) PPV (95% CI) NPV (95% CI)
S0 vs. S1-3 (>5%) 0.83 (0.72–0.93) 316 0.79 (0.69–0.87) 0.84 (0.64–0.95) 0.95 (0.87–0.98) 0.54 (0.37–0.70)
S0-1 vs. S2-3 (>33%) 0.79 (0.70–0.88) 316 0.87 (0.76–0.94) 0.61 (0.46–0.74) 0.73 (0.61–0.82) 0.79 (0.64–0.91)
S0-2 vs. S3 (>66%) 0.73 (0.63–0.83) 343 0.77 (0.59–0.90) 0.64 (0.53–0.75) 0.45 (0.32–0.60) 0.88 (0.77–0.95)
NASH 0.69 (0.59–0.79) 318 0.86 (0.71–0.95) 0.47 (0.35–0.59) 0.44 (0.33–0.57) 0.88 (0.73–0.96)

Values are provided with their 95% CI.

AUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CAP, controlled attenuation parameter; NASH, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV positive predictive value; Se, sensitivity; Sp, specificity.