Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 30;3(6):100381. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100381

Table 4.

Diagnostic performance of MRI-PDFF for grading steatosis and diagnosing NASH (n = 128).

AUROC (95% CI) Cut-off Se (95% CI) Sp (95% CI) PPV (95% CI) NPV (95% CI)
S0 vs. S1-3 (>5%) 0.97 (0.94–1.00) 6% 0.95 (0.88–0.98) 0.84 (0.66–0.95) 0.95 (0.88–0.98) 0.84 (0.66–0.95)
S0-1 vs. S2-3 (>33%) 0.95 (0.91–0.98) 11% 0.95 (0.87–0.99) 0.80 (0.68–0.89) 0.82 (0.72–0.90) 0.94 (0.85–0.99)
S0-2 vs. S3 (>66%) 0.92 (0.87–0.97) 20% 0.83 (0.65–0.94) 0.84 (0.75–0.90) 0.61 (0.45–0.76) 0.94 (0.87–0.98)
NASH 0.84 (0.77–0.91) 12% 0.97 (0.86–1.00) 0.60 (0.50–0.71) 0.50 (0.38–0.62) 0.98 (0.90–1.00)

Values are provided with their 95% CI.

AUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; MRI-PDFF, MRI-proton density fat fraction; NASH, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV positive predictive value; Se, sensitivity; Sp, specificity.