Table 3.
Facets, categories, overlap and unique elements in NWB operationalizations and conceptualizations.
1. We identified 489 studies with data on definition categories in NWB operationalizations and conceptualizations. | ||
---|---|---|
2. Categorized into facets: | 3. Meaningful overlap of defining elements: | 4. Tapped unique and meaningful elements: |
A. Nature of NWB: | Work violations | |
A1 physical | A1-5: 16 types | Organizational rulebreaking |
A2 psychological | Drug / alcohol use at work | |
A3 material | ||
A4 sociocultural | ||
A5 digital | ||
A. Occurrence pattern | ||
A6. systematic | All 16 types | |
A7. duration | ||
A8. escalation | ||
A9. visibility | ||
PWB | Positive behavior: in 4 types | |
B. Harm | ||
B1. physical B2. psychological B3. material B4. social |
B1-4: 16 types | |
C. Actor type | ||
C1. criminal/stranger C2. co-worker/manager C3. customer C4. relatives C5. group |
1: 14 types 2: 16 types 3: 15 types 4: 10 types 5: 16 types |
1: for 2 types 2: - 3: for 1 type 4: for 6 types 5: - |
C. Actor roles (15) | ||
perpetrator, target, bystander as witness C6. Constructive roles (5)active constructive: defending, sympathizing, defusing, interveningpassive constructive: empathizing. C7. Destructive roles (8)active destructive: facilitating, collaborating, manipulating, instigatingpassive destructive: submitting, succumbing, avoiding, abdicating. |
All 16 types C6/-C7: 3 types |
For 13 types, dynamic interaction, network methodto study actor roles |