Table 5.
Model-adjusted stepwise models of predictors of engagement in Combined, Web, and Peer Booster arms.
| Selected candidate predictors | Combined | Web Boosters | Peer Boosters | |||
|
|
χ2 (df) | P value | χ2 (df) | P value | χ2 (df) | P value |
| Treatment arm | 10.0 (2) a | .01 | NAb | NA | NA | NA |
| Education | 17.9 (4) | .001 | 9.6 (4) | .047 | 8.7 (4) | .07 |
| Income | 12.5 (4) | .02 | 5.9 (4) | .20 | —c | — |
| Employed | 3.3 (2) | .19 | — | — | 6.2 (2) | .04 |
| Rank | 6.0 (2) | .049 | 10.5 (2) | .005 | — | — |
| Anxiety (GADd) | 4.6 (2) | .10 | 3.7 (2) | .16 | — | — |
| Alcohol use severity (AUDITe) | 2.6 (2) | .27 | — | — | — | — |
| Confidence can reduce alcohol use | 3.5 (2) | .18 | — | — | — | — |
| Gender | — | — | 4.2 (2) | .12 | 8.2 (2) | .02 |
| Motive: social | — | — | 3.4 (2) | .18 | 3.6 (2) | .16 |
| Deployed | — | — | 3.9 (2) | .14 | — | — |
| Binge drinking frequency | — | — | 4.1 (2) | .13 | — | — |
| Traumatic event | — | — | 5.7 (2) | .06 | — | — |
| Marital status | — | — | — | — | 13.4 (6) | .02 |
| Depression (PHQf) | — | — | — | — | 6.0 (2) | .049 |
| Motive: enhancement | — | — | — | — | 10.1 (2) | .01 |
| Motive: coping with depression | — | — | — | — | 2.9 (2) | .23 |
| Drink and drive | — | — | — | — | 3.8 (2) | .15 |
aItalicized values indicate statistical significance at the α<.05 threshold.
bNA indicates that the predictor (ie, treatment arm) was not included as a candidate predictor in the model. All variables selected in each model were reported.
c—: Indicates that candidate variable was not retained in the model.
dGAD: General Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire.
eAUDIT: Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test.
fPHQ: Patient Health Questionnaire.